I think there is an argument that some level of vices are good for you, simply because for most people not partaking at all would drive up their stress, which is itself pretty unhealthy. But in this specific case I think a lot of the studies into drinking being good for you were funded by the companies that sold the drinks.
idk if vices are good for you, but people act like a lot of this medical science is not the accumulative averages of thousands of people shifting a value a couple of thousandths one way or the other. It's less true for smoking I think, but it's perfectly reasonable to say that drinking is generally unhealthy and tons of people will never be drastically affected by their moderate alcohol consumption because there are so many other variables in each individual's life that can never be accounted for. The same goes for a lot of "healthy" activities and foods too.
I think there is an argument that some level of vices are good for you, simply because for most people not partaking at all would drive up their stress, which is itself pretty unhealthy. But in this specific case I think a lot of the studies into drinking being good for you were funded by the companies that sold the drinks.
deleted by creator
idk if vices are good for you, but people act like a lot of this medical science is not the accumulative averages of thousands of people shifting a value a couple of thousandths one way or the other. It's less true for smoking I think, but it's perfectly reasonable to say that drinking is generally unhealthy and tons of people will never be drastically affected by their moderate alcohol consumption because there are so many other variables in each individual's life that can never be accounted for. The same goes for a lot of "healthy" activities and foods too.
what is it called?
deleted by creator