Libs, walking straight into chud talking points and framing in a blissfully innocent attempt at "nuance" since...1650? Earlier? Fucked if I know they've always been this way.

The usual GC types are already making out-of-context clips.

Uphold TC69 thought, combat liberalism, We love and fight with our Trans Comrades!

  • iridaniotter [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    In October she fell for the right-wing panic that Wikipedia was being "woke" and purposefully subjective. In reality Wikipedia was funding liberal anti-racist organizations. And the website has always been subjective as we all know. And in fact Wikipedia explicitly tells editors not to use primary sources. So you would think as a science communicator she would already have qualms with Wikipedia, but instead she only cares when the right tries to cancel it. Basically, this is now at least the second time she has fallen for right wing panic bait.