Libs, walking straight into chud talking points and framing in a blissfully innocent attempt at "nuance" since...1650? Earlier? Fucked if I know they've always been this way.
The usual GC types are already making out-of-context clips.
Uphold TC69 thought, combat liberalism, We love and fight with our Trans Comrades!
I felt her descriptions of said papers (which I've read) were deeply biased. In particular, she separates conclusion from explanation. She'll say "Study say trans=bad" and then ramble, and then say "But here are some concerns." and then instead of elaborating that that reverses the interpretation of the data entirely stops and goes onto the next paper. This repeats 4 times!