I always thought this argument was stupid, even if the monarchy is ”profitable” that doesn't mean having one is right. If the UK relegalized slavery and it was profitable, using the same logic slavery would be good.
into the Treasury, they also contribute significantly to economic growth in general — £67.5 billion annually
It's because they're business owners and landlords. The monarchy isn't a value add by itself. You could literally strip the titles and remove the ceremonies and they'd still have the same impact on economic growth. They're literally just part of the capitalist class.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
yeah because they fuckin own everything
I always thought this argument was stupid, even if the monarchy is ”profitable” that doesn't mean having one is right. If the UK relegalized slavery and it was profitable, using the same logic slavery would be good.
It's because they're business owners and landlords. The monarchy isn't a value add by itself. You could literally strip the titles and remove the ceremonies and they'd still have the same impact on economic growth. They're literally just part of the capitalist class.
School districts can't afford anything but new stadiums; they produce revenue just one more stadium it will be better this time :grillman:
Reactionaries: In a capitalist economy decisions are made based on rational reasons, not emotional.
Also reactionaries: When prince Bob joins the trade delegation, foreign business leaders will sign contracts that they otherwise wouldn't.