We already do this with some slurs, right? We can start enforcing these words, too.
Not calling anyone out, I’ve been guilty of it too. And we don’t have to do it all at once. Like, we can start with these:
Ableist words and alternatives.
Stupid, R€tarded, Idiot(ic), Cretin, or Moron(ic): People say this to imply something, or someone isn't intelligent or worth their time, but the words refer to people with intellectual disabilities. Instead, say that a situation or person is frustrating, ignorant, dense, unpleasant, cheesy, or awful.
Dumb: This word refers to a person who doesn't speak verbally, but people often use it to mean that something or someone isn't intelligent or wise. It's listed separately from stupid and its synonyms because it references a physical disability instead of an intellectual one. Try using any of the non-ableist synonyms like irritating or uncool.
Crazy, Nuts, Mad, Psycho, or Insane: "Wow, that's crazy!" may not seem like a harmful statement, but if you think about someone with a mental health condition hearing that statement, it's easy to realize that it is. So instead of using one of those words, try outrageous, bananas, bizarre, amazing, intense, extreme, overwhelming, or wild.
I can't tell if you're joking but "nuts" as an adjective or adverb can very easily be banned with zero overlap there. As an adjective in cooking, the uncountable form "nut" is used, "nuts" only being used as a noun.
Honest question because I don’t know: is an automated banned word filter able to tell the difference between “Add 50g of nuts to the dough” and “that person is nuts”? My assumption was no, but perhaps these things aren’t as bad as they used to be.
deleted by creator
we could ban "is%20nuts" and "re%20nuts" i guess but that would be nuts
The last ingredient is nuts.
keep those narrative format recipes out of here!
Fine! The most common food allergy is nuts.
As the other user said, we couldn't automate it, but it could still be policy if people wanted it to be.