Image is of Chinese FM Qin Gang and German FM Annalena Baerbock, in Berlin.


Conor Gallagher over at Naked Capitalism details the latest in EU idiocy - foreign ministers backed a more hardline position on China and are considering putting sanctions on Chinese companies that they accuse of supporting Russia. The ideological contagion of "you are either with us or against us" has, without a shadow of a doubt, taken root in the brains of European politicians despite whatever words fall out of Macron's mouth.

The obvious problem here is that China is the EU's biggest trading partner for goods, their second largest import market, and their third largest export market. China's manufacturing is equal to that of the US and Europe combined, outputting most pharmaceutical ingredients, processing most rare earths, manufacturing most solar power wafers, and leads the world in the clean energy market in general - important, as the EU has given up cheap energy from Russia. It is not impossible for the West to develop their own domestic alternatives, but it will take several years to do so, and the sanctions war may escalate independent of that timetable.


Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

Here is the archive of important pieces of analysis from throughout the war that we've collected.

This week's first update is here in the comments.

This week's second update is here in the comments.

Links and Stuff

Want to contribute?

RSS Feed

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can, thank you.


Resources For Understanding The War Beyond The Bulletins


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. I recommend their map more than the channel at this point, as an increasing subscriber count has greatly diminished their quality.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have decent analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: neo-conservative sources but their reporting of the war (so far) seems to line up with reality better than most liberal sources. Beware of chuddery.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent journalist reporting in the warzone.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist (but still quite reactionary in terms of gender and sexuality and race, so beware). If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ Another big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia's army.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


    • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]
      hexagon
      M
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For many, even most people, your earnings, job, age, etc, is directly proportional to your prestige and importance as a person. If somebody much younger than you has the same pay, then that implies that they have the same prestige as you, which is embarrassing to them.

      It's the same type of discrimination that people have towards women and people of other races, but applied to kids/teens/young adults/whatever. "I'm inherently superior to them so I should have more pay; if they have the same pay as me then that implies I'm not a special person, but I am!"

      of course, ideally, "from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs" would apply here and so two different people might receive different compensation from the same job, but that would just be because what a 18 year old needs might not be the same thing that a 60 year old needs and not because one is superior. although actually you might just do the "labor tokens" idea that some have suggested and have that be equal for the same work, and have equitable aid be independent of how much labor you put in, idk.

    • jimbojambo [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah I fucking hate that shit. The minimum wage in the UK, which is already disgustingly low at £10.42, (yet they have the cheek to call it the National Living Wage) then drops lower for under 23s with it being £7.49 for 18-20 and just £5.28 for under 18s. :ukkk:

    • Alesson1 [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can kids vote? The cynical answer is that they aren’t allowed to work past certain hours but those laws are going away soon.

    • familiar [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      It's actually good to have the kids engaged and financially stable you dipshits, keeps them out of trouble

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it's the assumption that kids have less responsibilities, no family to take care of, no kids to provide for, etc.

      With a job being the only way to provide under capitalism, it's seen as part of a person's status, the pay is not just about the work done.