So glad I never spent money on this past buying the first game—not only do they treat their employees like dogwater, they can't even squeeze out the big thing that justified Overwatch 2*

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Diablo 4 was pretty well-received, as far as I know, though obviously Diablo Immortal was a catastrophe.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I mean, I'd hope that the first act of the game looks good. Usually things don't start looking threadbare until the latter half. Overwatch was the first release in years that wasn't plagued with issues. SC2 was fine I think?

      • ssjmarx [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        SC2 was good when it came out and STILL has a big active playerbase thanks to the PvE "Allied Commander" mode (people also play the PvP ladder but its fallen off a lot harder). Blizzard should have learned from that game that there's a huge market for people who want to play these kinds of games but who don't want to constantly do stressful ass PvP, but I guess they didn't learn that.

        Starcraft: Remastered was really well received too, but WoW 3 Remastered was a dumpster fire on release IIRC.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        deleted by creator

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            deleted by creator

        • Owl [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          They did a good corruption plot in SC1 and then a serviceable bog standard fantasy version with WC3 and then forgot how to tell any other plot and just had repeated corruption/redemption arcs to fill in SC2

    • Waldoz53 [he/him, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      diablo 4 isnt out for another 2+ weeks though, besides these open betas theyve had, so they could easily fuck it up