this is vaguely related to the string theory related post from a day or two ago, it's all bazinga science folks TL;DW string theory is a big thing because people that read pop science really liked it and it took a long time for physicists to come out in force and say "this is untestable garbage"

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you know that watching a highly fictionalized, stylized version of something is not like doing or even watching the real thing? Have you ever watched snuff footage?

    • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't know that the first part is necessarily true. I think we might be stupider as a species than you give us credit for

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is not a matter of intelligence, it is a matter of the human tendency toward involuntary empathy for people right in front of them and a general revulsion towards human mutilation.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          deleted by creator

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Again, not universal, but at least common enough that large sections of the US consumer good and political economy are dedicated to it.

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am not using precise game theory arguments because this isn't reddit. You keep pushing the scope of this beyond the level of precision I am using about a silly cartoon. I feel no specific need to use this moment of silly cartoon man discourse to make this of any particular significance.

              Separately my assertion is that we all evolved from fish and have good and bad instincts we handle in different ways. People are around 80% good from the psychological readings I have done. Who knows if it is accurate but I go with that. However we still like seeing fucked up violent shit sometimes. Which given the squib discourse here I feel ought to be uncontroversial.

              • UlyssesT
                ·
                edit-2
                16 days ago

                deleted by creator

                • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I get you don't like my assertions that people probably behave in the ways we observe them behaving. What is your point? That we need to police everyone's treat consumption patterns? That all of this is fake and we haven't enjoyed problematic treats for all recorded history? That my media criticism skills are lacking and my analysis that sad man appears to be sad is fascile?

                  • UlyssesT
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    16 days ago

                    deleted by creator

                    • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Letting people enjoy a silly cartoon occasionally is misanthropic? I think you are losing perspective here

                      • UlyssesT
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        16 days ago

                        deleted by creator

                        • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          I'd that were simply it we wouldn't have a conversation. I think you are criticizing it incorrectly. You are mad at what it is, not what it does I feel. Which ignores the context of the moment in important ways.

                          • UlyssesT
                            ·
                            edit-2
                            16 days ago

                            deleted by creator