Permanently Deleted

  • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Either they’re going to struggle to barely provide for the child or they are going yo reconsider not having an abortion.

    Meaning, I cannot stress this part enough, that they are making the choice. If you asked for money to medically transition and I don't give, I am not coercing you against transitioning, I'm just not taking part in it. There's no reason that, if someone pregnant can make the choice alone whether to raise a child or not, that the person who impregnated them should have the exact same right. Sometimes respecting everyone's autonomy leads to shitty situations, that doesn't make it okay to violate someone's autonomy.

    • captcha [any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have no responsibility to assist me transisitioning. You do have responsibility to assist me raising a child if you got me pregnant and I choose to keep it. You cannot coerce me into getting an abortion an abortion more than you can coerce me into bearing a child.

      Yes it is shitty but bodily autonomy trumps financial autonomy. Anything else is :libertarian-approaching:

      • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Learn to fucking read. I'm tired of repeating this, this is not coercion because a physical abortion is not necessary for this. does it become more likely? Maybe. But it also might become more likely if you disclose you have a genetic disorder. That's still no coercion. So no, you don't have a requirement to help raise the child. And it doesn't violate bodily autonomy.

        • captcha [any]
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they cannot support the child on their own and your partner won't support then abortion is the only viable option. Not paying forces that option. Not paying is the partners choice. Genetic disorders are nobodies choice.

          I too am tired of repeating this. Good day.