• NoGodsNoMasters [they/them, she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    It's slightly disturbing to me that having read Capital through about half of volume 2 seemingly makes me more well read than like 90% of Marxists (on the internet at least), because I genuinely don't know what I'm talking about half the time lol

    • AHopeOnceMore [he/him]B
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it's kind of amazing. In the abstract sense it doesn't bother me, I'm fine with Marxist thought resonating with people even if they don't quite "get" the core of what Marx actually wrote.

      But then folks decide they get to have critical opinions, either towards Marx or based on some misapplication of Marx, and then they're annoying and can do harm. I've met "Marxists" that fall for the reactionary trope of "real workers" (blue collar, hard hat, etc) vs. everyone else. Like... just don't share your opinions until reading the stuff you imply you did, bro. Also, amazingly, I've run into entire self-proclaimed "Marxist" parties whose reading lists contain neither Marx nor summaries of his work. I shouldn't be surprised, then, that those parties spend most of their efforts on party building but can't create coherent messaging.

    • YoungBelden [any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven't read marx's capital, but i've got the marks of capital all over my back

      or something along those lines

      i don't expect the average worker to read capital, but yeah as @AHopeOnceMore@hexbear.net said it should at least be a prerequisite to making strong criticisms of marxian theory.

      everyone should at least try to understand the basic concepts though, understanding the mechanisms of capitalism is essential to fighting it.