I'm pretty far from a lib, but I feel it's a validish argument.
Russia has bombed civilian targets. It would be hard to do responsibly. Not impossible though. Hard doesn't mean they shouldn't.
That would incentivize people like zeilinskiyyyiyyyyyiii to perpetuate this conflict as long as possible. Especially as long as the US is willing to play ball. Zeilinskiyyyiyyyyyiii doesn't care about his people. If he did, he would have taken one of the earlier ceasefire deals, but noooooo!!!! Land is more precious than every single Ukrainian combined.
The absolute most important question that you can put to a people during a war is usually whether that war should keep being fought. Not allowing even electoral opposition to the guy fighting it is massively authoritarian.
I'm pretty far from a lib, but I feel it's a validish argument. Russia has bombed civilian targets. It would be hard to do responsibly. Not impossible though. Hard doesn't mean they shouldn't.
That would incentivize people like zeilinskiyyyiyyyyyiii to perpetuate this conflict as long as possible. Especially as long as the US is willing to play ball. Zeilinskiyyyiyyyyyiii doesn't care about his people. If he did, he would have taken one of the earlier ceasefire deals, but noooooo!!!! Land is more precious than every single Ukrainian combined.
Just have an election, tho?
The absolute most important question that you can put to a people during a war is usually whether that war should keep being fought. Not allowing even electoral opposition to the guy fighting it is massively authoritarian.