Completely disagree, the overwhelming majority of the "old school" communist parties have been completely hijacked by the new left that emerged during the sino-soviet split and collaborate with the Dictatorship of bourgeoise the bourgeoisie in action while uttering communist sounding epithets.
Let's also go over the fact you literally know nothing about the PCRF and came into this discussion with the intent of completely dismissing them in favor of the PCF - a party who's leadership and majority membership has totally rejected and denounced the Soviet experiment and has steadily adopted utopianist and rightist elements into itself in order to compete with the succdem French Parti socialiste, which they're still failing at - while blathering on about how it's "extremely annoying" to combat the right-opportunism that has entrenched itself into the corpses of the old parties of the west
Finally, on labor movements. I'm going to assume you're some sort of European, so your rightist eurocommunist "old parties" still has its ties to the trade unions. Ties that have been steadily rotting year by year as those parties retreat from drawing new blood from the working class and recruit and empower new leadership from the same pool of the bourgeois-educated intelligentsia the rest of the European parliamentary parties draw from.
On the off chance you're a Yankee that's had his head buried in the sand, the American old party had its ties to the trade unions torn apart by the trade unions and the State during the second round of communist purging to the point it had to go underground and leave a great void in its wake to only be filled with a great smattering of new left parties all competing to see who can grow the fastest. This great rending of the old party's ties to the American labor movement was so severe that in order to bring in enough new blood into the Party in order to sustain it into the future the leadership of the party chose to reorientate itself and begin to directly draw from the intelligentsia and groom them into the future leaders of the party. As the lead up to the disaster of '91 occured and in the massive void left behind by the destruction of the Soviet Union, a section of the future leaders of the old party attempted to stage an ideological coup in order to seize control of the party and direct it to follow the path of the European rightists. Quite obviously that impatient section failed, but ultimately the rightists won and liquidated the party until it was the current shell that it is today in the manner I discribed in an earlier comment above.
Completely disagree, the overwhelming majority of the "old school" communist parties have been completely hijacked by the new left that emerged during the sino-soviet split and collaborate with the Dictatorship of bourgeoise the bourgeoisie in action while uttering communist sounding epithets.
Let's also go over the fact you literally know nothing about the PCRF and came into this discussion with the intent of completely dismissing them in favor of the PCF - a party who's leadership and majority membership has totally rejected and denounced the Soviet experiment and has steadily adopted utopianist and rightist elements into itself in order to compete with the succdem French Parti socialiste, which they're still failing at - while blathering on about how it's "extremely annoying" to combat the right-opportunism that has entrenched itself into the corpses of the old parties of the west
Finally, on labor movements. I'm going to assume you're some sort of European, so your rightist eurocommunist "old parties" still has its ties to the trade unions. Ties that have been steadily rotting year by year as those parties retreat from drawing new blood from the working class and recruit and empower new leadership from the same pool of the bourgeois-educated intelligentsia the rest of the European parliamentary parties draw from.
On the off chance you're a Yankee that's had his head buried in the sand, the American old party had its ties to the trade unions torn apart by the trade unions and the State during the second round of communist purging to the point it had to go underground and leave a great void in its wake to only be filled with a great smattering of new left parties all competing to see who can grow the fastest. This great rending of the old party's ties to the American labor movement was so severe that in order to bring in enough new blood into the Party in order to sustain it into the future the leadership of the party chose to reorientate itself and begin to directly draw from the intelligentsia and groom them into the future leaders of the party. As the lead up to the disaster of '91 occured and in the massive void left behind by the destruction of the Soviet Union, a section of the future leaders of the old party attempted to stage an ideological coup in order to seize control of the party and direct it to follow the path of the European rightists. Quite obviously that impatient section failed, but ultimately the rightists won and liquidated the party until it was the current shell that it is today in the manner I discribed in an earlier comment above.
Yeah like I said annoying, this is the same stuff I get from anarchists but anti-revisionist-y.
Also I hope it wasn't you, since you were a mod the last time I checked, removing my comments?