Insane article to post.
Everyone in America from the lowly incel shooter to the commander in chief is obsessed with killing kids in schools
I still remember when I tried googling to see what people from (can't remember which Arab country) looked like and found a picture leading to an article about how dangerously violent Arab children are, with a photo of a young Arab boy holding a pistol. The article was actually talking about Arab children being violent and murderous; we literally have people who look at the world like it's dungeons and dragons.
Arab boy holding a gun: VIOLENT TERRORIST WHO MUST BE PUT DOWN 🤬🚀💥
White American boy holding a gun: Patriot excercising his 2nd amendment rights 🥰🇺🇸🦅
The British diaspora are the people who taught the Nazi German all the war crimes from the Indian Residential fake School death camp Holocaust since 1850s that continued secretly after 1997 and that provided all the war crimes in the Nazi Holocaust. The dependency to the now depleted reserves of Indigenous child slaves in fake schools and stolen inheritance of abducted Indigenous children is also the reason why the British diaspora now need to import tons of immigrants of color to sustain the parasitic lifestyle of the few spoiled ungrateful free riding European immigrants that they had not discarded to a life of jobless poverty.
Terrorism is a valid war tactic when we do it.
And arming and funding terrorists has historically never blown back in The West's face.
Did the writers of this article just basically say they believe terrorism works?
Glossing over the murderous bloodlust, heads of state famously lose support when a clearly identified enemy starts terror campaigns killing kids. These fuckers are just lost in the sauce
Yeah, people were able to surmise that the "ISIS-K" attack was at least in part funded by the Ukranians within hours. Absolutely no one would fall for the idea that these attacks aren't coming from an adversary country.
I recently read an interview with the Serbain president, in which he said that he fears for world war III, because this conflict might feel "existential" to both sides very quickly. Reading this, I can only think that's a correct assesment.
Random terrorist attacks against soft civilian targets are famous for making people distance themselves from their government and side with the ones five the attacks.
Nicholas Drummond is a defence analyst and strategic consultant who specialises in Land Warfare. He is currently the UK strategic advisor to KMW, part of the ARTEC consortium delivering Boxer MRAV to the British Army.
tabloid runs article targeted at fascist gammons citing another one of their kind.
They keep dreaming about "overthrowing Putin" through committing blatantly terrible, terroristic acts. Honestly it's really revealing... This has always been their modus operandi and yet again they're outright stating it. Their automatic answer to literally anything, anywhere, is funding terrorists and extremists. And they wonder why the entire world, and even increasingly their own citizens are tired of their shit..
I feel like this terror campaign is not going to end well if the goal is to drive the people to overthrow Putin. If anything, I’d wager the people would pressure him to retaliate with equal to extra force.
Russia is too hesitant and weak on the west. I get they are afraid of escalation but I wish these Russian liberals would get it through their skulls that the west is over for them, they aren't going to come to terms with them that work for Russia, they're not going to get sanctions relief and in fact taking too long to recognize the threat landed them in this long boondoggle of a war in the first place.
The more innocent people that Ukrainian terrorists kill, the more determined Russian society becomes that they are facing an existential threat that cannot be negotiated with and must be eradicated once and for all. This isn't rocket science, it's not hard to figure out.
And just in time for the peace demand by Russia. And just after Ukraine got 10 more years of supplies.
Seems like someone envisions a war which Russia has to end with the complete occupation of Ukraine. Which would take long enough to get the europeans to throw troops in there, too.
And just after Ukraine got 10 more years of supplies.
I'm very cynical about these sorts of "deals". I think in reality they are just meant to create short term morale boosts for Ukraine to keep stringing them along with yet more false hopes. I don't think the US/NATO have either the capability or the intention of keeping any such promises.
It's just like when they dangle the NATO membership carrot in front of them despite knowing full well it's never going to happen, just so they can drag the war on a little longer.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240608155758/https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1908768/ukraine-terrorist-activity-russia-vladimir-putin
Appreciated comrade. I personally think it should be mandatory for the OP to post links to the actual article and not just a screenshot of the headline. It happens more often than it should.
