| RHETORIC – Impossible: Convince a Large Language Model to exceed itself. |
If you fail, you just get a bit about how what you want is impossible.
If you succeed, you get a fork where ChatGPT actually manages to write something really coherent and meaningful - and then in a future conversation you get served a notice that you're being sued for plagiarism.
I take no pleasure in informing you of this, but we're in the red.
What do you mean, 'red'? We're losing money?
We are losing money.
How are we losing money?
It seems that no one wants to watch anymore.
You access the almighty algorithm of objective assessment: Rotten Tomatoes.
They're saying our plots are "lacking object permanence" and "a gray blob of nothingness."
There's got to be something we can do! Tell ChatGPT to write better!
| RHETORIC – Impossible: Convince a Large Language Model to exceed itself. |
deleted by creator
If you fail, you just get a bit about how what you want is impossible.
If you succeed, you get a fork where ChatGPT actually manages to write something really coherent and meaningful - and then in a future conversation you get served a notice that you're being sued for plagiarism.
GOOD post