Show

  • mar_k [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just think its an over simplification of human relationships to say someone with a career in an office job cant emotionally connect with a college student because of like... shared interests, or similar family backgrounds, or um, yaknow, sex and physical attraction*. Like to me the answer to "why would they" is simple as "I like them and im attracted to them". It really doesnt have to be more complicated than that.

    I mean you could replace "college student" with "high school student" and have almost the exact same (but more extreme) argument here. Like everything you said about "actively countering potential exploitativeness" I've seen someone on reddit argue for dating 15-17 y/os. I just don't think you suddenly become a genuine adult between your senior year of HS and your freshman year of college or whatever. For neurotypical people, it's a gradual process going into your mid-20's. I'm glad your relationship is healthy, but that's only because of a unique context

    I also think that something that is missed here is that like, millenials and zoomers have largely rejected the strict "life stage" developmental course that boomers imposed on us. Its sort of not as much of a thing anymore. A LOT of 30 year olds, not just ND ones, are still kind of just drifting through life and dont have that "different life stage" stuff people always talk about.

    Well boomers were a lot cooler about dating someone 10 years older than them when they were in college compared to zoomers now, so morals have definitely evolved in that way. Hell I'm pretty flexible compared to a lot of people I know. I mean, I saw a tiktok the other day calling 22 and 18 creepy. Some zoomers can almost be puritanical about this stuff

    I think people nowadays have acknowledged you don't have to have life figured out by your late 20's/30's, and that finding what you want to do is fluid, but we've also acknowledged you almost always have more life experience by that time, which isn't just about career (I just gave that as one example). And mainly, your brain is just inherently more developed by that age except for certain ND people. Age and maturity really isn't all that fluid for the vast majority of the population, it definintely is to a certain extent, but most people's brains develop at relatively similar rates, which is why 27 and 19 (for NT people) might have a similar maturity gap and be similarly problematic as, say, 19 and 15

    • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess I see where you're coming from but I still think there are nuances that are being missed. I definitly dont think that people saying what I said about 15-17 year olds are right in the slightest and I do agree that maturity isn't a switch that flips overnight. But my response to that has always been "the line needs to be drawn somewhere", and with my experience talking with younger people 18, or maybe 19, seems like a reasonable place to draw it". At some point we have to consider people adults who can make their own decisions, even if those decisions might be mistakes. (A friend of mine was recently telling me that "brain development finishes at 25" study isnt as good as people treat it as as well but idk enough about that to comment). Idk. I just consider the age gap debate to be "once you're an adult, its not my business who you love" and leave it there and dont understand why others get so into it. But I think part of that is that my autism brain cant relate to the way other people see age. Like I see people on reddit say all the time "I couldnt date someone x years younger than me, they're a kid to me" and I cant relate to it because my brain just doesnt envision it that way. I talk to younger people (18-24) all the time and they dont seem like kids to me. I just, idk, something doesnt click for me on this discussion.

      • mar_k [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        the line needs to be drawn somewhere, and with my experience talking with younger people 18, or maybe 19, seems like a reasonable place to draw it ... At some point we have to consider people adults who can make their own decisions

        I mean I have conflicting opinions on this. For one I think laws are different than morals, and things I find creepy I think still should still be legal. The line has to be drawn somewhere but I also think some adult rights and responsibilities should maybe be a gradual thing, although 18 is a good general number. I just find it very weird how, in most states, 16 is the age of consent, so a 16 y/o can sleep with a 40 y/o in my state, but a 20 y/o can't legally drink alcohol

        Ideally under communism, I think age of consent should be more nuanced. I think maybe it could be ruled in case by case bases in relationships of 18-24 y/o's with older people. Like if a 20 y/o dates a 30 y/o and shows proof of an exploitive and manipulative dynamic to a court, that should be punishable to a certain extent, although obviously not in the same way as between adults and minors. And yeah I agree purely sex isn't the same as dating

        A friend of mine was recently telling me that "brain development finishes at 25" study isnt as good as people treat it as as well but idk enough about that to comment

        Well nothing's a perfect number and there's no objective hard-line for maturity, but it's a good median and probably the most common number in a bell curve afaik. It's flawed because your brain continues developing into your 30's, but the vast majority of people finish critical developments around mid 20's (and I've talked to a few people over that age that all told me that's when they started feeling like a grown-up, like some things just clicked emotionally)