r/sendinthetanks may be more geared towards discussion and debate among its members. This could lead to a lower PageRank score, as it is not as actively linked to or referenced by other subreddits.
damn, they just called us out for not reading theory
It is listed by r/Sino as a subreddit that can be crossposted from, likely indicating a pro-China bias among its members.
you want to be informed about China? Well guess that means you have a pro-China bias, tankie!
we can see that r/democrats is positioned between r/Capitalism, r/progressive, r/SocialDemocracy, r/DemocraticSocialism, and r/Conservative. This may seem odd at first glance, but considering that these ideologies represent current US politics
the US, famed for its many demsoc and socdem parties
Additionally, even though one of the closest subreddits to r/conservatives is r/liberal, they are still relatively distant.
lol. lmao
When we look at the RTPRs, we find that they generally focus more on recent, state-level political events compared to other far-left communities.
news-megathread heads keep on winning, WE LOVE THE NEWS FOLKS
This is further supported by their lower RTPRs for social issues, e.g., police, climate change, healthcare, housing, gun control, unions, and taxes compared to other far-left communities.
or, you know, maybe many tankies just happen to not be fucking American, so your fancy model, likely trained on a predominantly American dataset, can only recognize discussion of "social issues" when it's specifically referencing domestic American politics
tankies mention Stalin nearly twice as often as Lenin
These pairs show that tankies simplify the complexity and diversity of Jewish identity and also the establishment and development of the State of Israel. Furthermore, this usage of Zionism disregards the historical and ongoing discrimination that non-European Jews have faced within Israel
no, you see, me brutally murdering this Palestinian child is actually for very deep and complex reasons
We find that tankies have a higher proportion of shared news outlets from “Revisionist World Powers,” which comprise state-sponsored or statecontrolled outlets from China and Russia ... , these findings may suggest that tankies prefer sources of misleading information compared to other far-left communities
using non-American news sources? um, actually, that's disinformation
Despite the robustness of our methodology
lol, fucking totally robust study here folks
Our dataset also has a notable lack of far-right communities. For example, there is no representation of fascism or alt-right communities.
oh, YOU FUCKING THINK THAT YOUR STUDY OF EXTREMISM MIGHT BE SOMEWHAT AFFECTED BY YOU JUST NOT STUDYING, LIKE, MOST OF IT?!
While the explosion in online extremism has mostly been on the right side of the political spectrum, the overall political leaning of researchers is on the left side of things [87].
damn those leftist professors, it's their fault we're not paying enough attention to the tankie threat! And you know what that fucking [87] citation is? "Pippa Norris. 2021. Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies"
There was also a citation for our boy of course. And the citation for Vaush is "Reuters. 2022. Fact check-CNN did not tweet a story about ’the kharkiv kid finder’"
what even is this study, did anyone proofread this shit
ah, the are that belongs to tankies, of course
randomly capitalized "Previous", [the] Cuban Protests, [the] Cuban regime
anyway, some other great bits:
damn, they just called us out for not reading theory
you want to be informed about China? Well guess that means you have a pro-China bias, tankie!
the US, famed for its many demsoc and socdem parties
lol. lmao
news-megathread heads keep on winning, WE LOVE THE NEWS FOLKS
or, you know, maybe many tankies just happen to not be fucking American, so your fancy model, likely trained on a predominantly American dataset, can only recognize discussion of "social issues" when it's specifically referencing domestic American politics
no, you see, me brutally murdering this Palestinian child is actually for very deep and complex reasons
using non-American news sources? um, actually, that's disinformation
lol, fucking totally robust study here folks
oh, YOU FUCKING THINK THAT YOUR STUDY OF EXTREMISM MIGHT BE SOMEWHAT AFFECTED BY YOU JUST NOT STUDYING, LIKE, MOST OF IT?!
damn those leftist professors, it's their fault we're not paying enough attention to the tankie threat! And you know what that fucking [87] citation is? "Pippa Norris. 2021. Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies"
There was also a citation for our boy of course. And the citation for Vaush is "Reuters. 2022. Fact check-CNN did not tweet a story about ’the kharkiv kid finder’"
Ok, and…?
This is actually really funny (although I am not in the least bit surprised)