• Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    But there are only two outcomes. There is no leftist opposition. There is Luka, who protects the economic interests of the working class in Belarus, and there is the neoliberal opposition. You claim "widespread support" for the protests but there is no evidence of that. It's very much based on class and age. Young professionals in the city overwhelmingly support the protests while older and more working class people support Luka. The young professionals want to live like French and Germans do, with more luxuries and a cheaper underclass to serve them artesanal pastries or whatever. The working class people want their stable factory jobs with good pay and benefits to not get sold to some American private equity firm that will lay people off and cut wages.

    • Corbyn [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 years ago

      You claim “widespread support” for the protests but there is no evidence of that.

      A lot of people going on the street counts as evidence. I can't give you numbers, as the government hasn't released any for many years.

      Young professionals in the city overwhelmingly support the protests while older and more working class people support Luka. The young professionals want to live like French and Germans do, with more luxuries and a cheaper underclass to serve them artesanal pastries or whatever.

      And again, you are reducing them to only acting based on selfish reasons and greed, ignoring all the valid reasons to protest. That they have grown up never seeing any other president than him, that the elections are most likely rigged, that the oppression is threatened and driven out of the country, and wanting to participate in a democracy are not legitimate concerns to you?

      • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Damn dude u got me. It's about the freedumbs n democrazys. I guess we should support every "popular" reactionary movement because they have "legitimate" grievances.

        The massive waves of Venezuelan chuds rioting because the PSUV consolidated power? I guess they're good and we should support them. They have legitimate concerns, after all. They want more freedom. Freedom to put their fascist political figures in power. That's democracy.

        Bolivian chuds rioting because Evo changed the constitution to allow himself to run again? Justified. Even if the riots culminated in a military coup and mass violence against indigenous people, they were justified because that was a very authoritarian move by Evo.

        • Corbyn [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 years ago

          I guess we should support every “popular” reactionary movement because they have “legitimate” grievances.

          Where do you see a call for support?

          It is about facing reality and not dismissing everyone and everything as CIA-backed while ignoring the causes.

      • EthicalHumanMeat [he/him]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        ignoring all the valid reasons to protest.

        It literally doesn't matter even slightly what "valid" reasons exist for the protest, since the end result is brutal, US-imposed neoliberalism and imperialist exploitation.