Libs always have economic arguments against good things (see Medicare for All) -- that's what makes them libs, not leftists. But once those things are in place they are not the ones clamoring to tear them down. This is fundamentally different from how fascists view them.

My point isn't that libs support good things -- they don't, at least not uniformly, and not actively enough -- it's that libs aren't going to actively sabatoge good things once they're in place.

Like I said earlier, things like universal healthcare benefit liberals, so they tolerate it and even support it. Housing homeless people is largely a detriment to their property value, so they oppose it. I could give other examples. White and Asian liberals absolutely hate affirmative action as much as their fascist peers, and they'll push to get rid of that shit as well. That's why so-called progressive state California doesn't even have affirmative action and hasn't had affirmative action since the 90s. Affirmative action wasn't scraped in California by fascists but by liberals. The only reason why the Democratic Party nominally support affirmative action is because of Black and Latine liberals.

Dehumanizing language is stuff like saying homeless people "infest" an area, calling homeless people "zombies," or calling for cops to clear "bodies" out of an area. You see this all the time from fascists but rarely from libs.

You never hear liberals complain about how homeless people are disgusting for smelling like piss and making everywhere else smell like piss because of public urination? You never hear liberals complain about how their tents are a complete eyesore and a vector for disease?