My understanding is that it was part of a tax bill that allows a company to write off depreciation immediately by reducing the usable life of a product instead of taking a percentage of a loss over multiple years.
When I looked into it, there are a lot of “well ackshually” articles about how destroying Batgirl was not tax advantageous
deleted by creator
My understanding is that it was part of a tax bill that allows a company to write off depreciation immediately by reducing the usable life of a product instead of taking a percentage of a loss over multiple years.
When I looked into it, there are a lot of “well ackshually” articles about how destroying Batgirl was not tax advantageous