One billion Americans, he suggests, would more rapidly discover technologies to “make prosperous lifestyles sustainable,” which in turn would render “irrelevant” the sheer number of prosperous Americans.
The following sentence is also a doozy. He has taken the Pinker Pill.
I've had someone use this kind of argument to reconcile them having children and the global ecological collapse. "More people means there's a chance of one of those additional people inventing a technological solution to all our problems."
Oh Jesus Christ is this the next phase of futurism BS? “Ok ok so we didn’t make a sci fi Story magic solution to the problem. But what if there were MORE PEOPLE to try to make these magic solutions?”
The following sentence is also a doozy. He has taken the Pinker Pill.
I've had someone use this kind of argument to reconcile them having children and the global ecological collapse. "More people means there's a chance of one of those additional people inventing a technological solution to all our problems."
Oh Jesus Christ is this the next phase of futurism BS? “Ok ok so we didn’t make a sci fi Story magic solution to the problem. But what if there were MORE PEOPLE to try to make these magic solutions?”