Like when you send a .7z instead of a .zip or .rar to a friend or a teacher because that's what your computer has installed and they're like "Oh No, not one of those, now I have to install 7Zip" even though the same program that opens .rar also opens .7z I feel like people are way more annoyed when they receive a .7z

  • mackwinston@feddit.uk
    ·
    1 year ago

    .rar is an awful proprietary format that needs to die, and die soon. You should NEVER use .rar files when sending files to others due to its closed proprietary nature.

    .zip is preferable because everyone can handle it by default. 7z is OK because nearly everyone can handle it by default and it is an open format.

  • Lmaydev@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just send a zip dude. You said yourself 7zip can already handle them. You're pointlessly making others install an application because of your personal preference hehe

  • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can't comment on that because I don't send archives very often, but here's my aliases (aliae?) in my .bashrc to make extracting easier:

    alias 7x='7z x'

    alias untar='tar -xvf'

    alias untargz='tar -xvzf'

    alias untarxz='tar -xf'

    alias ux='unrar x'

    and for zip files it's just unzip

  • vettnerk@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never apologize for my chosen file format. If they can't read it, they don't deserve it.

    Best regards,
    .tbz gang

  • monobot@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine me sending tar.gz without second though.

    It was first time they saw file with two extensions. They got scared and worried.

      • cadekat@pawb.social
        ·
        1 year ago

        It's common when you "wrap" one file type inside another. Like .tar combines multiple files into one, then .gz compresses a single file.

        You also see it with PGP (encryption).

        • luciferofastora@discuss.online
          ·
          1 year ago

          Suppose I have a javascript file for a node server's backend access named db.js

          Suppose I write tests for those functions and name the test script file db.test.js

          Suppose I tar and gzip that file (bear with me), now named db.test.js.tar.gz

          Suppose I sign that file with PGP, now named db.test.js.tar.gz.pgp

          Now suppose I want to hide that signed compressed tarball of a javascript tests file for my db functions, and to do so, I name it .db.test.js.tar.gz.pgp

          Now I have a file that looks like it consists of nothing but extensions. I'm sure you could push it even further though, if you tried.

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who uses RARs who doesn't use 7z though?

    I think using anything other than deflate zip for things like sending to teachers or whatever isn't very wise, and if you're not then you won't need to apologise anyway

    • GreenMario@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pirates. Almost always pirated software that comes in rars. Probably due to how it can be split up.

  • haych@lemmy.one
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just use 7zip to make .zip if I think the person I'm sending it to won't know what a .7z is or how to unzip it.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't really see the point in using .rar or .7z in 90% of cases, makes very little difference in filesize compared to zip and anyone can open it without problems

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nnnnnnnnnope. I give them the 7z and tell them where to get 7Zip. If they have WinRAR isntalled, then they also likely hide their extensions, and won't even know they received a more modern archive. If all they have is Windows's WinZip implementation, then they'll need to install 7Zip or something. You don't want to install it? Then I guess you're not getting the file you so desperately want, because I'm not resending it in a .zip. 7z for the win.

  • uralsolo
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • Dr_Wu@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I refuse to send anything except .zip to basically anyone I know. Because if it was anything else they'd be confused. With the things I'm sending on a regular basis, small images and documents, the difference in performance between archive formats doesn't really matter anyway.