• crispyhexagon [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    brutalism traditionally just means its a structure with exposed concrete. the term "brutalism" as used in architectural discourse today is literally in reference to what is more properly called "new brutalism" a chief proponant of which was FLW with his "organic" movement.

    saying its not brutalism because it incorporates colourful elements is nonsense.

    tldr: brutalism has multiple styles, and is defined by its use of exposed concrete.

    • EldritchMayo [he/him,comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Fair enough. I’m not really an expert on brutalist, just a fan of FLW. I do think though that unfortunately his style doesn’t hold up as well for large buildings, most of his are single units and I tend to associate brutalism with larger multi unit buildings. I’d have to see some more brutalist buildings to develop a proper opinion. Some of the flat soviet ones are kinda boring and plain, but I like habitat 67 in Montreal. Pretty sure that became a bougie place to live though.

      • crispyhexagon [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        yeah, the style is tricky to scale upwards i could agree with that, but i wouldnt say its impossible to implement. just takes careful consideration, which is sadly lacking when the concern is profit rather than living standard.

        either way, its still a good entry point for people who think brutalism by its inherent nature is ugly, since.. yknow.. obvious refutation