I've been seeing more often (and others have posted the same) that some of the elements of "Reddit etiquette" seem to be taking over here. Luckily I can still find discussion comments but it seems the jokes and general "downvote because I disagree" are slowly taking over.

So the question becomes is it the size or the functionality of the site? The people or popularity? What's your thoughts?

edit: should I change it to Lemmy-hivemind? Exhibit A: the amount of downvotes without a single explanation (guessing it's anything to do with Reddit being talked about).

  • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]
    ·
    3 months ago

    The structure of Reddit’s content aggregation and curation leads to a regression to the mean. Things that are broadly agreed-upon, even if wrong, are amplified, and things that are controversial, even if correct, are attenuated. What floats to the top is whatever the hive mind agrees is least objectionable to the most people.

    One solution that seems to work elsewhere is to disable downvoting. Downvoting makes it too easy to suppress controversial perspectives. Someone could put forward a thoughtful position on something, and if a few people don’t like the title and hit the downvote button, that post may be effectively buried. No rebuttal, no discourse, just “I don’t like this, make it go away.” Removing the downvote means if you don’t like something, you can either ignore it, or you can put effort into responding to it.

    The “downvote to disagree” thing isn’t just an attitude problem, it’s a structural issue. No amount of asking people nicely to obey site etiquette will change the fact that the downvote button is a disagree button. If you don’t want a hive mind, you necessarily need to be able to allow for things you don’t like to be amplified.

    Twitter is actually better for this than Reddit because it has the quote function. You can amplify something you don’t like as a way of getting other people to hate it with you. It’s not perfect, but there’s no way of having it both ways. “Reddiquette” was never a real thing, just a polite fiction that ignores the Eternal September world that we live in.

    If you have the same structure as Reddit, you will recreate Reddit. Lemmy isn’t going to be different if all the incentives and interactive elements are the same.

    • LedgeDrop@lemm.ee
      ·
      3 months ago

      The “downvote to disagree” thing isn’t just an attitude problem, it’s a structural issue. No amount of asking people nicely to obey site etiquette will change the fact that the downvote button is a disagree button. If you don’t want a hive mind, you necessarily need to be able to allow for things you don’t like to be amplified.

      Actually, with enough interactions from different people (ie: enough data points) Lemmy should be able to determine if a comment brings value to the conversation (either positive or negative) or if it's noise that should be ignored (and prioritized lower).

      If you have 4 comments:

      1. Has 100 upvotes (in total)
      2. Another has 100 downvote (in total)
      3. Another has 50 upvotes and 50 downvote (100 in total with a 0 sum)
      4. The last was a new comment with 0 votes.

      It's obvious that 1 and 3 are providing more to the conversation than 2. 4 is a bit of an outlier, but probably provides more value than 2.

      Regarding 3: The challenge would be that there's a low chance that there will be such a wide margin of upvotes/downvotes. Due to the hive mind, the voting will probably look like 30 upvotes and 130 downvotes. So, there would need to be a weight accordingly, so those fewer upvotes had a greater impact (in terms of sorting and scoring comments)

      Reddit has a "sort by controversial" algorithm that seems to be missing from Lemmy (or maybe it's hidden in the “what's hot" - I haven't looked at the code).

      It would be awesome (and resource intensive) if Lemmy could provide the federated instances with custom sorting algorithms. It would allow federated instances to be unique, provide some playful competition, and given the open source nature of Lemmy - I'm sure these algorithms would be open sourced, which would improve the entire Lemmy ecosystem as a whole.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        3 months ago

        You're assuming that downvotes only come from individual users with good-faith opinions there.

        Relying upon an automated system to decide the "value of a conversation" is, and will continue to be, an open invitation to gamify, metagame, and manipulate such automated systems, just as it was on Reddit and elsewhere.

    • DearMoogle@lemmy.today
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      A lot of the issues on Reddit is a human problem. I agree – solutions need to be built into the platform itself, by thoughtful design. It makes less work for the mods too.

  • Zoift [he/him]
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remove downvotes. Unironically, its a good idea. Requires people to actually engage with something if they disagree rather than just downvote and move on. Gets people talking & raises user engagement. Will be an uptick in shitflinging for a short while till all the assholes out themselves, get banned, and site culture improves from that alone.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      ·
      3 months ago

      One of my several Reddit accounts followed that principle: only upvotes allowed, no downvotes. Then, when I said that in a comment someone discussed with me how stupid they thought that practice was. They believe it was completely undesirable for Reddit, citing what happened in YouTube after they removed the downvote option. I didn't care to understand, but that experience allowed me to develop a perennial restraint for hitting the downvote button. I use it scarcely against what I'm convinced are trolls.

  • bazingabrain [comrade/them]
    ·
    3 months ago

    How it took over: liberalism

    How to defeat it: agressive communist mods

    No need to thank me 😌

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    ·
    3 months ago

    Whenever I saw someone complaining about the "hivemind" over there, they were invariably whining about people not liking their unpopular opinion on something. When you say "hivemind" you are equating anyone with that opinion to insects/drones/NPC etc. Just because you're different doesn't mean you're right.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      3 months ago

      There's an old saying about how if everywhere smells like dogshit, it's best to check under one's shoe.

      I think some people accuse others of being in a "hivemind" in a way that's like they brought the Reddit with them, in particular the presumed sense of superiority over the hivemind/sheeple/"NPCs"/whatever.

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      3 months ago

      fair point, using negative language while looking for engagement and conversation isn't the best start. Do you have a better descriptive I can use and possibly edit the post with? (genuinely asking, I would enjoy everyone's opinion)

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think your premise is flawed. There's no such thing as a "hivemind" or what it implies. Opinions will exist on a spectrum of popular to unpopular depending on the community they're posted in. I would say that those descriptors are perfectly adequate as they are.

        • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          3 months ago

          I'm finding it difficult to respond because of the "popular to unpopular" description you've applied. I feel like by definition that in itself is a "hivemind". So maybe like you said the entire premise is flawed. For someone wanting lemmy to succeed as a place where discussions and opinions can be shared and open, whats a positive aspect that you feel could encourage that type of engagement?

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don't really understand what it is you're after. Do you want a place where people only get positive reception no matter what they say? Maybe that exists in a group therapy session, but I don't think that's what you're asking for. Is it?

            Is it about getting down voted? Who cares? You can't control how other people react to your opinions and you shouldn't try. Lemmy is diverse and it is federated. Each instance and community has its own rules and culture. If you don't find any of the communities to your particular liking, you can always start some of your own.

            • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
              hexagon
              ·
              3 months ago

              For the first part, no not a group therapy session lol. "thoughtful reception" is probably a better apt description. You can definitely have a level of control for how your opinion is received with your attitude and how you engage in a conversation. A space and how conversation is conducted usually sets a precedence, the tools available to you with how you interact with that content is another part of it.

              I was just looking for conversations about this style of social platform and the known problems that seem to inflict it. I want Lemmy to stay diverse and federated, I'm seeing a concerning trend of tribalism revolving around instance membership or interaction. As you said I can start a community if I'm looking for something else, which I have done. Starting a new corner of lemmy to stretch out in has been a wonderful experience and has helped me focus on something I want to be creative and engage with instead of wandering around Lemmy "all".

              But, I can't help but wonder if that's the downfall. I've been instance hoping a lot lately, it's amazing to see what's been hidden that I'm not seeing and as spaces become more condensed or closed off through defederation the stark contrast between instances is only going to grow. Basically mini-reddits (the negative parts of it), instead of spaces being smaller to allow more chances to not drown out a differing opinion. So am I contributing to this or refuting it by making my own community? Do I have a chance to avoid the main opinions becoming the mindset that others want to follow when engaging or is it just an uphill battle because of the format of this social platform. A lot of really interesting and thoughtful responses in this post, exactly what I'm looking for in community discussions and there's been barely any hate or downvotes. It's been refreshing and given me plenty to think about.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    3 months ago

    It may be impossible to prevent such community-wide erosion especially on an individual basis, but I think the best one can do to at least not contribute to that erosion is maintaining a sense of vigilance about the foundational idea at the heart of Reddit's site-wide rot: "I am smarter than the out-group, and anything I do within the in-group to increase my score affirms that I am endlessly clever and funny."

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
    ·
    3 months ago

    Reddit is notorious for astroturfing. The lemmy hivemind(s) is the lemmitor hivemind from people socialized on Reddit who came to lemmy and brought that shit with them. Same with other instances like .world, but worse because they have fewer legacy users.

    • gomp@lemmy.ml
      ·
      3 months ago

      What is that you care to preserve? Can't you just register a new account and kill the old one? (genuinely curious)

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Many users have stated they would like to keep their comment history and subscriptions. Move their account to a different instance. Having to start from scratch is a big hassle.

        The fediverse concept is great but users are locked into the instance they create their accounts on. With so many instances it is better to just start somewhere and figure out what's what later.

        So far I am happy with my instance. But if I ever change my mind it would help if migration was simple.

  • imaginepayingforred@lemm.ee
    ·
    3 months ago

    Literally nothing can be done to avoid it. The "Reddit hivemind" is the human hivemind. When enough people start contributing to a certain community, certain ideas usually unanimously shared between individuals get boosted up to the top and become general consensus.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The "Reddit hivemind" is the human hivemind.

      Reddit doesn't represent the entirety of humanity. It represents a specifically self-selecting group of people that tend to come from a combination of converging material conditions that allow them access to the site, and site retention for each user depends on whether that user is likely to opt into that particular group's increasingly-ossified norms that are provided superficial but effective incentives to continue doing so by the site's owners.

      Social groups can and do change over time, and some are better or worse off in varying ways, and they are not all "Reddit hiveminds" unless you are lazily equivocating all human social structures as "hiveminds." What else is there? Some fantasy of rugged Randian individualism?

      To say otherwise is useless fatalism, or at the least, false equivocation.

      Show

    • bazingabrain [comrade/them]
      ·
      3 months ago

      certain ideas usually unanimously shared between individuals get boosted up to the top and become general consensus.

      Weird how those ideas of yours usually correspond with something western politicians and think thanks spout on the daily.

      Weird how non western ideas that somehow survive deletion are usually downvoted to oblivion or flagged and hidden.

      Weird how Reddit hired a literal CIA agent to manage their content even though said person had zero experience working that role.

      Weird weird weird back-to-me

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        3 months ago

        But everything at all times is the Reddit hivemind. Nothing can change or improve. Reddit is inevitable. smuglord

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml
    ·
    3 months ago

    Stop over-policing people. Just because you disagree with something someone says, doesnt mean you have a right or duty to shut them down

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Between the Boston bomber and the APIpocalypse it seemed to me like the hive mind got a lot better, even on Reddit. You could find a lot of different perspectives, and it was rare for one that's definitely wrong to stay on the top. Unless you just define "hive mind" as insufficiently conservative or whatever.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    ·
    3 months ago

    We talk about it as a hive mind, but I think it is actually a problem of large numbers of users and an algorithm that needs tweaking, plus some shady mods.

    You post but you're too late, or you have a legit opinion that needs a few sub comments, but it's too late.

    Or you get trolled, you respond in a similar vein, and the mod bans you but not them, because the mod likes their opinion more. And I don't blame mods for being soft in general, because it is a shit job. But sometimes it's frustrating.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    ·
    3 months ago

    Isolated communities sharing rigid points of view are a problem, but I think the voting system is to blame. When someone disagrees and downvotes as a consequence, it changes the way that comment is read by the next reader, this will likely generate inertia over the way the message is read in general through time.

    I can't explain why I do like to read other people's comments. Most of the time I do not bother to engage in conversations with strangers, but Lemmy has several advantages over Reddit just because it doesn't count or publish people's "karma". It's a blessing that some instances of Lemmy can also hide the voting system altogether, which is the only way I can beat the anxiety of putting my thoughts out there. I think these elements make Reddit more addictive, because a "good" number in your comments and profile confirms your membership to a given community. I believe it also shapes a "correct" way of thinking.

  • monobot@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 months ago

    I see it just as extension to "cancel culture" in IRL society. Nothing complicated just same stuff pushed from media comes to the web. Much helped by algorithms that are supporting it.

    It is not only reddit, whole public internet is just an echo chamber, with no critical opinion allowed.

    Every topic in current society (at least Europe+North America, I don't know what's happening in the rest of the world) is either black or white and no in between. Very scary place we are in currently. And people put you in some category just based on one sentence, one though, one idea.

    I don't see anything special here or on reddit that is not happening in other parts of our society.

    Maybe fediverse is so clean you can see it happening live, just look at any defederation request and what they think of different opinions. Different opinion is forbidden. I never thought we will ger to this point, I believed internet will give us freedom of speech and freedom to discuss. But so many topics have become dangerous.