- YouTube
m.youtube.com
Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.

The kicker:

The system isn’t purely run on AI. It also relies on human input to help it learn and become more accurate.

And then

And so far it’s getting high marks from employees

(no employees interviewed or cited)

Who call it “Bo-Linda”

Love to regurgitate company PR material as fact

  • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]
    ·
    1 month ago

    In the 90s? I mean, up to the mid to late 00s? By, like, almost everybody?

    Pretty sure that most people consider only things with nervous systems to be able to have qualia, which is a requirement for sentience.

    No, it was used in the context of non-biological, sentient computers

    This thread is the first time I encounter somebody using 'AI' to refer to something sentient in general.

    I don’t understand why you shifted the topic to artificial biological beings and said that people weren’t using “AI” to describe that

    Because most people don't seem to think that non-biological things can have qualia (well, some religious people do seem to think that some non-biological things do, but, in that case, those things are non-material, so we can add being material to the relevant list of requirements). Unless my assessment is wildly incorrect and there are people who think so, none of them used 'AI' to refer to artificial non-biological things that are sentient.

    In the case of people who think that there are material non-biological things that are sentient, I'd like to ask them how they make guesses about this stuff, and whether or not they consider their PCs as sentient, and if not, why not.