What's the implied (final) solution to this extremely concerning situation, bucko? peterson-pain

    • BeamBrain [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      conservatives [...] support organizations that provide essential supplies and care to pregnant women and mothers

      lmao no they don't, conservatives have spent decades systemically dismantling every form of assistance for mothers. Their credo is "there is no such thing as society" and if you can't afford to raise your kid then fuck you, that's your problem not theirs, pull yourself up by your boostraps

      • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
        ·
        26 days ago

        Telling a baby to push itself out of it's own womb because it hasn't been issued bootstraps yet.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          26 days ago

          There's a reason why children conveniently don't exist or get mentioned in Atlas Shrugged. ancap-good

          • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
            ·
            26 days ago

            The title was actually the result of somebody asking Atlas what to do if a baby starts crying.

          • BeamBrain [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            It's funny because for all their posturing about "protecting children," kids are everything conservatives despise: weak, unable to produce value for capital, and not yet fully assimilated into the neoliberal propaganda machine.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              hexagon
              ·
              26 days ago

              Chuds want to screw children in more ways than one. libertarian-alert

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
      ·
      26 days ago

      Who does that economic "boost" benefit? Because we're sitting on 40 years of neoliberal policy that has squeezed the working class to achieve it and the benefits sure as shit haven't trickled down. I'd say that's enough time to draw conclusions from the data.