• HamManBad [he/him]
    ·
    2 months ago

    French Canadians are a good example of this, since the split was 300 years ago

      • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah i read that too, where the accent we yanks associate with British today grew from an upper-class affectation that developed after the war?

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          2 months ago

          My understanding is that prior to radio the uk had like 300 mutually unintelligible "dialects" of "english" and it was bbc broadcasts that turned English English in to something resembling a single language. And we ended up with the "received pronunciation" dialect or something. Like if Americans settled on Mid-Atlantic as the correct way to talk.

          • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
            ·
            2 months ago

            Imagine a beautiful world where Americans adopted a universal accent from 1930s gangster movies and everyone went around saying "now see" and "you'll never take me alive, copper."

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe a few decades ago. Idk how much of the old dialect is still around. Try looking up "boston brahmin dialect"

    • jack [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, they have simply developed in a different direction that is in some ways more conservative and in some ways more innovative. It's not a really a good comparison to a single generation of an immigrant family.

      • TechnoUnionTypeBeat [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        2 months ago

        Especially with the wild differences in French Canadian communities. Acadians are different from Quebecois who are different from Franco-[Province], a language somewhat unites them but not much else (and even then the French spoken differs strongly in each group)