The most immediate example I can think of was called "Subverse," which was directly advertised as some sort of anti-SJW (I think it was called that at the time because woke/DEI weren't quite in common use yet) 
pandering game where you played some boring ego insert that had a space harem that marked as many safe dopamine boxes for boring nerds as possible to pander to 
gaters and cater to their cooming needs.
The game was boring. Full stop. It was boring. The gameplay itself was shallow and uninspired, and even the le sexy sex scenes were boring according to the general assessment of the very same treat hogs it was targeted to pander toward.
"Yandere Simulator" would count if that steaming pile of irradiated shit ever actually got completed. It was like Star Citizen for kiddie creeping weeb gooners, but less profitable.
The problem the reactionaries have is that they can't write fictional sexy content without it becoming kink while at the same time they view all kink as leftist/sjw unless it is straight "traditional" pandering shit. They make an exception for this when they're consuming it as pure pornography, like hentai or whatever, because your porn consumption is "secret" and that's ok. Liking femboys or queer or bdsm or ntr cuckoldry hentai is fine in that "secret" consumption. But outside of that? BAD. Kink is not something REAL MEN do.
So when they put anything sexual outside the "secret" porn setting, it becomes bland and boring as fuck.
This is some sort of shame thing going on. It ultimately relinquishes all sexuality in media outside of pornography to the left.
Eye candy is probably the only thing they allow or have going in most of their games, and even then it's kinda dull, boring, and uninspired. Men in full suits of armour while women wear bikini-armour, that kind of thing. But that's not the same thing as a raunchy scene that actually tries to do something interesting.
You could write some really good stuff that panders to them but they'd be embarrassed and ashamed about it and would have extremely mixed emotions about it being more than their "secret" porn. Because, let's be real, they have a lot of kinks that aren't just vanilla trad cath shit. They're just ashamed of it.
I'm still baffled by the very long chud tradition of them being really horny for what they call (CW: transphobic fetish words)
spoiler
"futas" and "removed" and "traps"
and the like but also violently hating trans people and expressing a desire to harm them.
That's an amazing observation, and now I can see it practically anywhere chuds indulge themselves or pander to each other without those bothersome "wokes" actually making things that entertain them.
Marvel brain is a fuck. Plastic people, often lacking sensuality but sometimes being really horny in (SV-coded) bursts.
Domination thing perhaps. I can't really say for sure. Power? It's similar to misogyny in that the more they hate women the more they consume violent and humiliating sexual content against women.
Lots of old fashioned anti-black bigots consume lots of interracial porn of the most "cuck"/SV kind, and that's reflected in the internet data coming out of pretty much any GOP convention (alongside gay hookups and the like) that might come to town.
All that repression and shame isn't healthy.
Chuds seem to interpret the feminine stirring desire in them as the feminine having power over them. And they hate that feeling. So yeah, there seems to be a feedback loop of desire leading to needing to feel power over the feminine which only creates more desire.
Huh. This has helped shine a light on why the audience for fetish art tends to have a lot fewer CHUDs than people would expect. They're probably still there, but they just never share their CHUD opinions.
It's interesting! I don't have all the answers about exactly the causes of this but the observation is fairly clear when you think about it.
Pod Damn America has a great episode that touches on a lot of this you should definitely check out.
https://soundcloud.com/poddamnamerica/russ-mckamey-pt-2-w-miss-violet-faraday