*removed externally hosted image*

Cant believe they are increasing the prices this much in one go, gonna be going back to adblockers.

  • NuraShiny [any]
    cake
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It's so nice to live in the EU, where my right to block ads is protected by law.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It's more so that you are allowed to try to block ads. If YouTube adds DRM or otherwise manages to stop usage of ad blocking, they are completely in their right to do so.

      IIRC if something runs on your system, you have the right to mess with it, however you want — e.g. block specific parts of the site, or use reader mode etc.

  • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I have YouTube Premium though not the Family variant and Google won't just fix their app. It is way behind NewPipe or YouTube ReVanced. No, I don't need shorts. No I don't need constant nudges to join groups of YouTubers by paying after I just paid you money, Google!

    What I want is system wide quality setting (what exactly does High or Data Saver mean; would it kill you to give 480p, 720p or 1080p as options) or Sponserblock integration (okay, this thing is probably never gonna happen but still). YouTube 's app is a stinking pile of shit. I just use YouTube Music from them and will cancel/not renew my plan after it lapses.

    • eluvinar@szmer.info
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It's funny, because sponsorblock and vanced only exist because of youtube's greed. And now I can't imagine using their service without them, even if they rollback the annoying ads. And they can't implement them. It's really the problem they made for themselves.

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A LOT of people pay for that. I was flabbergasted as well. Why would you pay for a free service? This feels like buying premium bottled tap water and they don't even bother to filter out the chlorine and the heavy metals.

      • TankieTanuki [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Why would you pay for a free service?

        If it were a charity or non-profit that would be one thing. Google is doing fine without your support though.

      • Chump [he/him]
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It started out incredibly cheap ($15 mo for six people), and includes a Spotify style music streaming service

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I'm surprised more people aren't using uBlock Origin. It's an absolute necessity for browsing the web anymore.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I honestly think it' seven more important to have an adblock on a phone.

        The amount of pages that on mobile are an advert covering the top half, and a give us your data prompt at the bottom seems to be nearly everything these days. At least on a monitor there's room for the content.

  • style99@lemm.ee
    ·
    9 hours ago

    To be fair, this does add more to the pot for YouTube creators.

    If you're a YouTube Premium member, you won't see ads, so we share your monthly membership fee with creators. Best of all, the more videos you watch from your favorite creators, the more money they make.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So this has been true of YouTube Red since the beginning. It's one if the reasons I got it. But they use watch time as the way to divide your money out. It actually makes it extremely unfair split for people that make great but short content. It's also why longer content became more popular around that time and those 24/7 streams run like that.

      Also why creators started doing channels of just padded run time content of like building legos and eating things. It's to secure better and funding.

      The current setup is pretty busted and feels like the wheels are coming off again.