Being a "sex god", to the type of "man" Andrew Tate is, basically involves getting as many women as possible to sleep with you through general sleazy schemes and pick up artistry. The woman's pleasure doesn't factor once into the equation. As long as she acts out an adequate performance (act being the key word) and fakes an orgasm, that's enough. He knows the whole thing is fake but it doesn't matter, it's never spoken about and they move on and continue. Real life becomes an act of pornographic performance. That's his whole brand. Muscular guy with supercars sleeping with lots of hot women.
Isn't his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god?
i actually don't think that's true for any of these guys. sexual competency requires a certain amount of empathy and compassion that none of these fucks are interested in. they really don't talk about it either. for the set that is most interested in the particular message of gender norms that they offer, the dominance is much more important than any notion of "pleasing women"
I'm kind of glad I don't really understand these guys at all. "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people" is really trite right until it isn't.
Isn't his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god? Complete and utter self-report.
How the hell is he considered a beauty standard?
deleted by creator
lewd discussion on sex
Being a "sex god", to the type of "man" Andrew Tate is, basically involves getting as many women as possible to sleep with you through general sleazy schemes and pick up artistry. The woman's pleasure doesn't factor once into the equation. As long as she acts out an adequate performance (act being the key word) and fakes an orgasm, that's enough. He knows the whole thing is fake but it doesn't matter, it's never spoken about and they move on and continue. Real life becomes an act of pornographic performance. That's his whole brand. Muscular guy with supercars sleeping with lots of hot women.
Living pornographic kayfabe, if you will
i actually don't think that's true for any of these guys. sexual competency requires a certain amount of empathy and compassion that none of these fucks are interested in. they really don't talk about it either. for the set that is most interested in the particular message of gender norms that they offer, the dominance is much more important than any notion of "pleasing women"
Is this some kind of weird neo-puritanism do-not-cum
incel pandering thing?
it is for some of the consumers of this, but in general it's just an appeal to the classic misogynistic notion of women as property
I'm kind of glad I don't really understand these guys at all. "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people" is really trite right until it isn't.