Permanently Deleted

  • PKMKII [none/use name]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Greatest sexual self-own since Shapiro’s “my wife has never had a wet-ass pussy.”

    • UlyssesT
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • Lussy [any, hy/hym]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honestly, I don’t think even he takes what he says seriously. Dude is scum of the earth, but this is literally to get a reaction out of people

    • UlyssesT
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • Midnight_Pearl [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 months ago

      "haha i'm terrible in bed! cope and seethe liberals"

      everyone thinks he's terrible in bed

      "fools! i was merely baiting you! i have won!"

    • Riffraffintheroom [none/use name]
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean yeah, it’s a bit. More specifically, it’s Dick Masterson’s bit from the 90s. I grew up watching this guy on Ricki Lake and it’s been surreal seeing Tate just shamelessly bite his persona.

  • vegeta1 [none/use name]
    ·
    2 months ago

    These manosphere types talk about woman's orgasm like its the shroud of turin i-cant

  • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    2 months ago

    unironically he might be asexual. he talks about sex as if all that's in it for him is the power dynamic of doing the fucking. very similar to trump in that regard actually.

    • UlyssesT
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • keepcarrot [she/her]
        ·
        2 months ago

        The sort of guy that has brutalised sex out of themselves and can only imagine everyone is doing it for domination and bragging rights among the bros

    • PKMKII [none/use name]
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seeing as how Trump hooked up with a pornstar and all he did was raw dog her, I think you have a point.

  • Angel [any]
    ·
    2 months ago

    I see too many manosphere types saying the "Female orgasms aren't real!" kind of shit so often that I genuinely can't believe it.

    It has to be like a secret bit "between the bros" or something at this point. This is just absurd.

    • UlyssesT
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • Thallo [love/loves]
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because feeemales experiencing pleasure during sex would have no scientific purpose.

        It doesn't. The female orgasm couldn't solve a single mathematical theorem

  • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Not surprised, but way to tell on yourself, fucking bozo packwatch

    Chrome-dome over here can't even pass the bare minimum

    • UlyssesT
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • anarcho_blinkenist [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I imagined volcel dredd slowly and motionless like a statue sliding horizontally with grinding stone noise with that scowl, and a doubletake you wise up lmao

  • Babs [she/her]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Had anyone considered that he might be gay? Like one of those "eww vaginas are gross 🤢" sorta misogynistic gay guys? I just get that vibe sometimes.

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Isn't his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god? Complete and utter self-report.

    How the hell is he considered a beauty standard?

    • UlyssesT
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago
      lewd discussion on sex

      Being a "sex god", to the type of "man" Andrew Tate is, basically involves getting as many women as possible to sleep with you through general sleazy schemes and pick up artistry. The woman's pleasure doesn't factor once into the equation. As long as she acts out an adequate performance (act being the key word) and fakes an orgasm, that's enough. He knows the whole thing is fake but it doesn't matter, it's never spoken about and they move on and continue. Real life becomes an act of pornographic performance. That's his whole brand. Muscular guy with supercars sleeping with lots of hot women.

    • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn't his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god?

      i actually don't think that's true for any of these guys. sexual competency requires a certain amount of empathy and compassion that none of these fucks are interested in. they really don't talk about it either. for the set that is most interested in the particular message of gender norms that they offer, the dominance is much more important than any notion of "pleasing women"

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is this some kind of weird neo-puritanism do-not-cum volcel-kamala incel pandering thing?

        • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
          ·
          2 months ago

          it is for some of the consumers of this, but in general it's just an appeal to the classic misogynistic notion of women as property

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]
            ·
            2 months ago

            I'm kind of glad I don't really understand these guys at all. "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people" is really trite right until it isn't.

  • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jesus Christ this is embarrassing.

    Why would someone post this; isn't "being terrible in bed" extremely bad for his brand?

  • Yukiko [she/her]
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is what happens when you focus only on yourself during sex. Not surprising a man like this can't get us off.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There are so many things I could say but all I can say is "is this your dude?"