• Nakoichi [they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me rephrase that in a way you might better understand:

      You're an anti-communist clown that would gladly collaborate with fascists

      In fact, you're actively hoping for an opportunity to do so, just so you could oWn tHe tAnKiEs

      Eat shit

      Ah shit I just said the same thing @Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net said, ah well guess there isn't any better way to say it shrug-outta-hecks

      • Unmarketable Plushie@pawb.social
        ·
        1 year ago

        Today I learner that I, a far left anarchist that desires the complete abolition of state and a direct democracy of the people, is an "anti communist clown that would gladly collaborate with fascists". And that apparently worshipping totalitarian dictatorships is the only real form of leftism and is definitely not fascism with a red coat of paint.

        In fact, you're actively hoping for an opportunity to do so, just so you could oWn tHe tAnKiEs

        Care to show me where I ever said that?

        • Nakoichi [they/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          You're defending a literal fascist right now in this very thread.

          Moss is a piece of shit and this instance is full of actual genocide deniers

          Like this https://hexbear.net/post/372306

            • Nakoichi [they/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              What exactly are you talking about? Where is my genocide denial?

                • Nakoichi [they/them]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So you have nothing?

                  Got it.

                  You're not even siding with genocide deniers you're siding with people that openly admit that genocide is justified.

                    • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      The Soviet Union ended the Holocaust, the only thing standing between the annihilation of Korea was the DPRK, without the communist party China would have been erased and become japanese territory. The people most able and willing to end genocide at the end of the day are communists.

                        • edge [he/him]
                          ·
                          edit-2
                          1 year ago

                          Ahh yes, the “genocide” triggered by a drought and kulaks burning crops out of spite where more Russians and Kazakhs died than Ukrainians. And the “genocide” where Uyghurs were exempted from the one child rule and have an increasing population, and there’s zero evidence (or even claims) of any killings.

                        • 1nt3rd1m3nt10n4l [he/him]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          "Double Genocide" historiography is literally Nazi propaganda. It's not even a view supported by actual academic researchers & historians who are critical of the states which you are talking about.

                        • Egon
                          ·
                          edit-2
                          3 months ago

                          deleted by creator

                        • sammer510 [none/use name]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          The only things the Soviets did wrong was not killing enough people actually. Too many Nazis were allowed to survive by the US and UK

                    • Nakoichi [they/them]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      I'm not even a tankie lol you make all these assumptions about me just because of the instance I am on.

                    • ReadFanon [any, any]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Yikes!

                      You:

                      You don't know shit about my political opinions

                      Also you:

                      Stop putting words in my mouth you little shit, you KNOW I don't think that

                      Remarkable how you apply a completely different standard of behaviour to others than you do to yourself. The person you replied to literally has an anarchist flag in their profile picture and, if you wanted to, you'd be able to confirm that they're an anarchist based on their comment history. Or you could have just asked. Heck, you could have even told them straight up that you're skeptical of their political orientation and you'd probably get a straight answer out of them in response.

                      I wonder what an anarchist would have to say about a person who egregiously and wilfully applies double standards? They probably wouldn't care. It's not like it's a big deal to anarchists to avoid the imposing of unjust hierarchies in the attempt to coerce others into silence and/or being banned via guilt-by-association. It's probably completely fine.

                    • tuga [he/him]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Look at the way you talk, you're a child

                • edge [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Guilt by association fallacy

                  You're siding with the genocide denialists

                  limmy-what

        • Flaps [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Curious, just a few comments up you said you were a socialist

            • Flaps [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              a far left anarchist that desires the complete abolition of state

              This is litteraly your previous comment. So what are you?

              I mean, you're more than welcome to learn from us on Hexbear in good faith, but so far you just came out of the gate swinging, calling everyone a 'tankie' while the more you speak the more clear it gets that you don't know what you're talking about. So don't be surprised when people rightfully dunk on you. I too have a lot to learn but at least I know when to shut up.

                • Flaps [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You've already proven you don't know shit, don't have to keep doing that. So are you an anarchist or a socialist? Can you even differentiate between the two when it comes to the role of the state?

                  • Unmarketable Plushie@pawb.social
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I'm an anarcho-socialist you whiny piece of shit. Anarchy. is. a. type. of. socialist. theory. I can't believe you call yourself a fucking leftist and don't even know that. It just goes to show how all you tankies are right wing LARPers pretending to be leftist because they like the aesthetics.

                    • Flaps [he/him]
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      1 year ago

                      Yeah this ain't it chief. Still didn't awnser as to how socialists and anarchists differentiate when it comes to how both ideologies envision the role of the state.

                      But considering you act like you know all that, maybe explain it to me?

                      But you know what, on second thought, fuck it. There's no point on dunking you any further, it would just make me feel as pathetic as you. So far you've called yourself a socialist, an anarchist, an anarcho-socialist, without even giving a hint of having ever read anything that makes you able of even identifying what's what.