The Soviet Union ended the Holocaust, the only thing standing between the annihilation of Korea was the DPRK, without the communist party China would have been erased and become japanese territory. The people most able and willing to end genocide at the end of the day are communists.
Ahh yes, the “genocide” triggered by a drought and kulaks burning crops out of spite where more Russians and Kazakhs died than Ukrainians. And the “genocide” where Uyghurs were exempted from the one child rule and have an increasing population, and there’s zero evidence (or even claims) of any killings.
"Double Genocide" historiography is literally Nazi propaganda. It's not even a view supported by actual academic researchers & historians who are critical of the states which you are talking about.
Prove it. Hit me with your state dep drivel, come one let's see your zenz sources. Let's see some radio free Asia or some long since debunked malcalculus of 50 bazillion dead that counts "people that would have been born" and dead nazis.
Stop putting words in my mouth you little shit, you KNOW I don't think that
Remarkable how you apply a completely different standard of behaviour to others than you do to yourself. The person you replied to literally has an anarchist flag in their profile picture and, if you wanted to, you'd be able to confirm that they're an anarchist based on their comment history. Or you could have just asked. Heck, you could have even told them straight up that you're skeptical of their political orientation and you'd probably get a straight answer out of them in response.
I wonder what an anarchist would have to say about a person who egregiously and wilfully applies double standards? They probably wouldn't care. It's not like it's a big deal to anarchists to avoid the imposing of unjust hierarchies in the attempt to coerce others into silence and/or being banned via guilt-by-association. It's probably completely fine.
You're defending a literal fascist right now in this very thread.
Moss is a piece of shit and this instance is full of actual genocide deniers
Like this https://hexbear.net/post/372306
Guilt by association fallacy, as it's completely irrelevant to your OWN genocide denial that's being criticised here.
What exactly are you talking about? Where is my genocide denial?
You're siding with the genocide denialists. Don't pretend you don't know what I'm talking about.
So you have nothing?
Got it.
You're not even siding with genocide deniers you're siding with people that openly admit that genocide is justified.
Shut the fuck up. You are a fucking tankie. You have zero fucking right to lecture me on genocide you little shit.
The Soviet Union ended the Holocaust, the only thing standing between the annihilation of Korea was the DPRK, without the communist party China would have been erased and become japanese territory. The people most able and willing to end genocide at the end of the day are communists.
You're leaving out the fact that the Soviet Union and Communist China carried out/are carrying out genocides of their own.
Ahh yes, the “genocide” triggered by a drought and kulaks burning crops out of spite where more Russians and Kazakhs died than Ukrainians. And the “genocide” where Uyghurs were exempted from the one child rule and have an increasing population, and there’s zero evidence (or even claims) of any killings.
"Double Genocide" historiography is literally Nazi propaganda. It's not even a view supported by actual academic researchers & historians who are critical of the states which you are talking about.
Prove it. Hit me with your state dep drivel, come one let's see your zenz sources. Let's see some radio free Asia or some long since debunked malcalculus of 50 bazillion dead that counts "people that would have been born" and dead nazis.
The only things the Soviets did wrong was not killing enough people actually. Too many Nazis were allowed to survive by the US and UK
Why would a socialist nation do that?
I'm not even a tankie lol you make all these assumptions about me just because of the instance I am on.
This is just the alternate form of "I depicted you as the soyjak", Reddit ass argument
It's what you deserve. Good faith discourse is reserved for those that are willing to engage in it
Yikes!
You:
Also you:
Remarkable how you apply a completely different standard of behaviour to others than you do to yourself. The person you replied to literally has an anarchist flag in their profile picture and, if you wanted to, you'd be able to confirm that they're an anarchist based on their comment history. Or you could have just asked. Heck, you could have even told them straight up that you're skeptical of their political orientation and you'd probably get a straight answer out of them in response.
I wonder what an anarchist would have to say about a person who egregiously and wilfully applies double standards? They probably wouldn't care. It's not like it's a big deal to anarchists to avoid the imposing of unjust hierarchies in the attempt to coerce others into silence and/or being banned via guilt-by-association. It's probably completely fine.
Look at the way you talk, you're a child