One of the squares could be ableist slurs, and another can be homophobic "joking" about their political enemies.
Another square could be "WHO HURT YOU?"
Libs love to weaponize the idea of concern.
Yeah that wouldn't take long to fill.
One of the squares could easily be "people disagreed with me; this is an echo chamber."
I think it does, and it does both ways.
Libs tone police others and accuse others of being too "thin skinned" for their logical rational truthfacts of reason.
Yeah, you’re gonna need a lot more than that or else it’s gonna be "BINGO!" after 2 comments already.
- double genocide theory or similar - there's been a fair bit of that one around lately
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_trivialization seems to be a commonly used general term as well
-
totalitarian isn't used as much lately, but it still comes up sometimes
-
more LGTBQAI+ drone pilots, not sure the best wording, but something about 'protecting human rights' which just means sending military to a foreign country
-
greeted as liberators, is that still a thing?
-
world police
-
international rules based order
-
US / western foreign aid
just some options for you
Yeah, the US and EU are both officially endorsing the double-genocide Holocaust denial now. In think the EU parliament passed a resolution or something on it and the US State Department has been using it as a carrot to court favor in the Baltics and Eastern Europe.
It's kind of fucked that a bunch of extremely online communists are forming what seems like a steadily shrinking memory reservoir for the Holocaust and Nazi atrocities generally.
now is not the time for ... could be another option - kinda similar to vote though
greeted as liberators, is that still a thing?
tangentially, this goes back a while. an instance of this from the War of 1812:
President James Madison was intrigued by the analysis of Major General Henry Dearborn that in the event of war, Canada would be easy pickings — even that an invasion would be welcomed by the Canadians. [source]
