slevin [none/use name] to Main • 4 years agoNo way! Apparently some people made a podcast based on this lemmy instance. It's not great, but they are trying.external-linkmessage-square24 fedilinkarrow-up1117
arrow-up1114external-linkNo way! Apparently some people made a podcast based on this lemmy instance. It's not great, but they are trying.slevin [none/use name] to Main • 4 years agomessage-square24 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareslevin [none/use name]hexagonhexbear4·edit-24 years agothey are, but I will roast them for it, which I am also free to do link
minus-squaregayhobbes [he/him]hexbear2·4 years agoWas that a roast? I didn't even put my sunglasses on. link
minus-squareslevin [none/use name]hexagonhexbear3·4 years agoso you were once again invoking free speech to suppress my own free speech, expressed in the form of criticism link
minus-squareBudwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]hexbear3·4 years agoI was merely criticizing your criticism of their speech, through the employment of my own free speech. Also, I was just trying to do an Andrew Ryan impression but that bit clearly didn't land link
minus-squareslevin [none/use name]hexagonhexbear4·4 years agoBut by invoking free speech and implying I was infringing uppon it, you are implying that what I'm doing is against the law, or should be. Oh, I totally got that. No idea what bit I'm doing. link
they are, but I will roast them for it, which I am also free to do
Was that a roast? I didn't even put my sunglasses on.
Most certainly, quite indeed so.
so you were once again invoking free speech to suppress my own free speech, expressed in the form of criticism
I was merely criticizing your criticism of their speech, through the employment of my own free speech. Also, I was just trying to do an Andrew Ryan impression but that bit clearly didn't land
But by invoking free speech and implying I was infringing uppon it, you are implying that what I'm doing is against the law, or should be.
Oh, I totally got that. No idea what bit I'm doing.
ok, glad we're on the same page then