Facemasks and social distancing will be needed until next summer, the head of Oxford's vaccine trial team said last night.
Andrew Pollard warned strict rules would have to be followed even if global tests proved successful. He said the first jabs would probably not be available until next year – and then only for key groups such as frontline health workers.
Professor Pollard said that he hoped the final trials could be completed by the end of this year but added: 'Life won't be back to normal until summer at the earliest. We may need masks until July.
If we end up with a vaccine that's effective in preventing the disease, that is by far the best way to control the virus. But in the medium term, we'll still need better treatments. When does life get back to normal? Even if we had enough vaccine for everyone, in my view it's unlikely that we're going to very rapidly be in a position where the physical distancing rules can be just dropped.
'Until we've got a high level of immunity in the population so that we can stop the virus so most vulnerable people are immune, there is going to be a risk. Initially, we're going to be in a position where mask-wearing and social distancing don't change.
'Only when there is a big drop in serious cases will governments feel able to relax these measures. This is a very easily transmissible virus.'
The Oxford University vaccine, produced with drugs giant Astrazeneca, is one of only nine to have reached phase three trials, the final stage before implementation, and is widely seen as the leading candidate to deliver.
In his remarks to an online seminar with Oxford alumni, Professor Pollard explained that, if successful, the vaccine will need approval from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
He said: 'Once we have the trial results, I can't imagine they will do that overnight.
'They will have to scrutinise the data very carefully – the public would not expect any less.'
The final evaluation, he said, is likely to take weeks, even though he and his team have begun a 'rolling programme' to give the regulatory agency access to the trials while in progress.
Rolling out the vaccine will pose a 'huge logistical challenge', the professor pointed out.
In his remarks to an online seminar with Oxford alumni, Professor Pollard explained that, if successful, the vaccine will need approval from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
He said: 'Once we have the trial results, I can't imagine they will do that overnight.
'They will have to scrutinise the data very carefully – the public would not expect any less.'
The final evaluation, he said, is likely to take weeks, even though he and his team have begun a 'rolling programme' to give the regulatory agency access to the trials while in progress.
Rolling out the vaccine will pose a 'huge logistical challenge', the professor pointed out.
Oxford's vaccine is based on a genetically engineered type of coronavirus that gives chimpanzees a form of the common cold.
Trials of the jab involve 20,000 volunteers in Britain and other countries being given either the vaccine or a harmless placebo.
Professor Pollard said early results had shown that the vaccine causes the body to make antibodies against Covid, and that these last for at least three months.
Tests on volunteers given the jab in April will soon show whether they lasted for six months. 'The evidence so far in the lab is that the antibodies are able to stop the virus in its tracks,' said Professor Pollard.
At least one person in the trial has become seriously ill, and has had to be hospitalised with the disease, he added.
Kate Bingham, head of the UK Vaccine Taskforce, said there was only a 'slim' chance the Oxford jab could be ready by Christmas.
She said she felt optimistic from the data seen so far in trials. But she warned against assuming a Covid-19 vaccine would be better than flu jabs, which are only around 50 per cent effective.
'It's most likely that it'll be next year,' she added.
That's reasonable. Masks are fine, it's just the mindset of "this is how things HAVE to be" forever is really unhealthy, unnecessary, and I wish people would knock it the fuck off. Protecting your neighbors doesn't mean being moaning over sensational bullshit from the media
Read the first line of the goddamn article jesus.
How do you not understand that the media pushes sensational stories constantly to keep you afraid? Why is the capitalist media suddenly absolutely correct?
Are you 14? Is 8 months from now "forever?"
deleted by creator
Different parts of the Capitalist class have different interests. Most large businesses have been booming during Covid. Even companies like Nike, which you think would do poorly in a down economy where no one is leaving the house, have been booming. Outside of the travel industry, things have been fine. The reports of economic "devastation" are extremely exaggerated, and a blind reading of traditional metrics simply does not reflect material reality.
Most of the lost jobs have been precarious service industry jobs. Oh boy, Capital sure hates it when poor, desperate people get even more desperate! Same with civil unrest. Golly, it sure sucks for Capital when the state appears to be weakening!
deleted by creator
Nothing. Who owns the guns in this country? The Right! Which side do the police and military support? The Right! What are "radicalized" younger people doing? Voting for Democrats to change the world, man!
deleted by creator
The Left cucking hard on Covid is pretty prescriptive of why we are the state we are - most Leftists are just Liberals who naively think that Democrats and the media are Good and Honest, but get foiled by evil Republicans or "donors" as opposed to a wing of the Bourgeoisie that's fighting the other side of the Bourgeoisie.
deleted by creator
Which is not "shut everything down" like the psychotics are doing in Melbourne...
deleted by creator
I'm going to go with the WHO, who does not recommend lockdowns anymore.
deleted by creator