we got lib fash and con fash folks. we got one soc fash grandpa.
In this case it's not being unserious it's just being a dishonest genocide supporter that needs to fool her constituents into thinking she isn't one.
Not just deeply unserious; spectacularly unserious! There's gonna be a lot of violence.
They only even bother with the rhetoric so their followers can use it as a cudgel.
Lol mods, deleting the tanks just makes people post twitter takes to /c/chapotraphouse
#vive la resistance
It's not slop or news, and don't think it fits into gossip
(and the center point is not the take, but summation of warren dipshittery)
Liberals literally only care about words. Actions are of no concern. It's why when you bring up Biden's actions supporting genocide, they say "haven't you heard what Trump said??"
Seriously, use this model when interacting with liberals. It's so frustrating to see it over and over.
Or like how Biden is the most pro environmental president even though we're producing more oil than any nation in history.
Or how he's the most pro labor president despite the literal strike breaking.
It's the core of the difference between libs and people who aren't incredulous dumbasses. You can list half a dozen terrible things that dems are doing and they'll link you to a press relief from the dem saying they support freedom and liberty and that's literally go enough for them.
Their entire worldview is that words speak louder than actions.
it's because they only follow politics on a very surface level, they only read headlines and see what their friends are posting on social media snippets.
In this type of understanding there's no follow-up to see what actions were done to follow promises. There's no long term memory. There's only day-to-day outrage about incendiary statements.
