https://archive.ph/tROuB

  • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    1 month ago

    In terms of carbon emissions, not even close. In terms of environmental impact, not really. In terms of societal impact, a car is a car, the fewer the better.

    • kristina [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      it halves it but its still not nearly enough for a green transition. things like ebikes, trams, trains, e-buses, etc. are much more important to focus on over cars

      Show

      • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 month ago

        For sure buses, bicycles, and trains would be miles and miles better for the environment and for society, but halving emissions is not "almost as bad."

        The best car is still no car.

      • Gosplan14_the_Third [none/use name]
        ·
        1 month ago

        Electric cars and regional trains having around the same impact

        Well, guess it's time for the Green liberals to gut regional train infrastructure in favor of more car-centric cities over here agony-soviet

        • kristina [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I think the issue is these are categories as measured. Regional train infrastructure is ass and doesnt have many passengers if it were modernized it may be fine

        • kristina [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Its e scooters used by those ride sharing apps afaik, those have gigantic turnover. Normal e scooters are right above ebikes