Like obviously personal property can include hygiene products, firearms, or electronic devices. However I've seen some Marxists say that houses can be considered personal property so long as the land they're built on is owned publicly. Is this a valid perspective or are these champagne socialists clinging to their liberalism?
You'd still have to sell it for someone else to personally own if you're going to move, especially if you're hard defining not being able to own multiple.
I used communist society here to mean advanced stage communism, where there is no money. You could maybe trade your house for another or just announce that it is free to whatever service is used to look for places to live. In less advanced communist societies you might still sell and buy houses.
Fair enough.