Forgive me if this was addressed, but I don't think it was. During a previous struggle session in a statement from the mod team something was said along the lines of "the he/hims aren't beating the allegations".
Personally I do not think this is acceptable, to me this is just using "he/hims" as a proxy for saying men. No one in IRL settings uses "he/hims" as a term to describe people who use him/him pronouns, no one is categorized into a grouping in general based on their pronouns as it is just a preferred pronoun not a characteristic like gender identity.
If there is misogyny going on, just say there is misogyny among users, their pronouns do not change the content of what they said, if someone with he/him pronouns and someone with she/her pronouns typed the exact same degrading thing about a woman, their pronouns would not factor into whether what they said was misogynistic or not.
I am bringing this up as it seems like people in the mod chat are still using "he/hims" to refer to people who have indicated they prefer he/him as their pronouns, you might think this is progressive because you are not directly making a gender identity assumption, but I believe this is in fact reactionary and you are just using pronouns as a proxy for the gender that is most commonly associated with the given pronoun i.e. men in the case of saying "he/hims".
I think this is at least counterproductive and at most harmful, if knowing someone's gender identity is relevant or useful, it should just be asked for.
The point of having pronouns is to accommodate and to treat people with respect and dignity about what they prefer to be called. Using pronouns as a proxy for gender identity undermines this as, treating someone with dignity would involve asking them directly what their gender identity is, not making judgments or assumptions based off of their preferred pronouns.
The only thing that having he/him pronouns indicates is that the person prefers to be referred to with the pronouns he and him. They are just personal pronouns, they are not equivalent to an ethnicity, a gender identity, a gender expression, etc.
If someone with he/him pronouns seems like they are misogynistic, that may have something to do with their gender identity, but it has nothing to do with their pronouns. It is not fair nor accurate to make assumptions of gender identity from pronouns and I think this should be avoided.
This is not to undermine any concerns about misogyny, but misogyny can and should be fought against regardless of what pronouns are involved in any instance of it.
Thanks for reading this, please know all I want is for pronouns and gender identity not to be conflated and to create a safe and respectful space for all users. And I think a good way to work towards this would be to stop using "he/hims", "she/hers", "they/thems", etc. as a way to refer to people who specify they would like to be referred to as those pronouns.
I see it as the discomfort of being in a space that isn't made for me for once.
Am I a huge piece of shit? I don't think so and I don't think many other people would think so. Am I the all-knowing gender God? Obviously not. I'm fine, but I am often made to feel less than fine here.
Everywhere else is made for me and it's extremely comfortable. A very small minority of places are made for not me and my responsibility is to sit in the discomfort that those places create (as long as I'm welcome there in the first place) and work out the root of that feeling.
The solution to all places being made for one demographic is not to make places that are not for that demographic, but to make the other places inclusive. How we go about doing that can be discussed, but arguing that a place being unwelcoming being a "good thing" in and of itself reminds me of black capitalist discourse.
Cities are in large part made for men, but good urban planning isn't to shit on men. It's to stop shitting on everyone else, which, incidentally, turns out to make cities better for men too. And funnily enough if your main goal (or even just if it is just one of your goals) is to make a place unwelcoming for a certain demographic, then you're just going to make the place worse for all involved. Likewise with online spaces. At times you will need to make a place unwelcoming to one group (womens' shelters for example) but you gotta be very consderate about it and consistent, neither of which are going on here.