Edit: Damn, did not expect this to turn into today’s struggle sesh.
Here’s my both sides/both sides take. Should people be executed for drawing, publishing or showing hateful cartoons? Probably not.
What grosses me out is how Enlightened Secular France has spent centuries colonizing and brutalizing muslims and continues to oppress them with discriminatory laws while acting like the entire point of Free Speech TM is the right to degrade a profoundly marginalized minority.
As someone brought up in this thread, the whole Mohammad cartoon controversy reminds me of the perennial debate “why would a black person get violent if you call them the n-word, it’s just a word.” Context matters, when you purposely provoke an oppressed minority by shoving the thing they find most offensive in their face, you may get a violent reaction.
I don’t think this guy deserves to die at all, but Charlie Hebdo is very racist and it’s gross how people rally around it like it’s this bastion of free speech.
That said, death to A Wyatt Mann. Inshallah.
One of the covers shows an ISIS member about to behead Muhammad, who protests that he is the prophet and is told "silence infidel" in response.
I can see why ISIS members would want to kill over that. Making the argument that their ideology has no basis in the religion they claim and would destroy it as much as anything else.
Magazine also puts out things shitting on christians and the pope.
Do you want to live in a world where criticism of power is met with death? Even if the content is offensive, that hardly seems like a good place to be.
The terrorists didn’t walk, and France is upping their anti terrorism. But this posturing by the government is alarming to all Muslims not just extremists
Which is probably going to end up causing more problems than this.
deleted by creator
Yeah let's walk on eggshells then. Dog forbid we offend any religious folks.
deleted by creator
I don't give a fuck about Charlie Crapdo, for what it's worth their doodles are neither clever nor funny, nor have any artistic merit. But if you're saying that mocking religion - any religion - is an offence punishable by death then you're a reactionary, pure and simple.
deleted by creator
Punching down is not an acceptable form of "mocking".
Yeah, it's what they do. What are you even arguing? Now you're just victim blaming, Charlie Hebdo says shitty things so people deserved to die?
Is South Park awful because they tried to offend an entire religion by simply having Muhammad stand there for a minute?
No one deserved to die but all the peaceful Muslims don't deserve this display as a response to what this one murderer did either.
Yeah I guess.
I do think they should be shown, not all of them perhaps, but I think it's important. Government shouldn't do it.
Yes. Herein lies the problem.
Government is essentially encouraging something that bothers all muslims on account of the murderers. The result of this? Will be more murdering, but also the complete alienation of the peaceful muslims that might help. That alienation and lack of willingness to help will be noticed by other people and will turn into anti-muslim racism. That anti-muslim racism will create more sympathisers and extremists.
The result here is an incredibly divisive action that throws all muslims under the bus for the sake of stirring nationalist rhetoric and dividing the left between the people who are able to rationally work through why this is bad and the people who are having a reactionary emotion of "fuck them I support making this grand stand against it".
I am actually deeply suspicious that this is an op. It doesn't feel right.
They shouldn't be shown. These are quite frankly terrible. They won't convince anyone, they won't deracidalise or convert anyone. They're crude jokes, not part of a constructive dialogue.
If you shows these to innocent people you thing may be offended by it, you're an asshole. Laugh at them if you like, but once you start displaying them publically you're only making people's lives slightly worse.
Should it be illegal? No, but it ranges from insulting at best to racist and homophobic at worst.
deleted by creator
It's the fairly obvious implication when you start shitting on the murder victims and justifying the motive.
deleted by creator
Again, the title goes out it's way to call them racist.
I understand taking a punch because it's for the greater good, but a teacher taught about this years later and in response he was hunted down and beheaded.
deleted by creator
I’m not saying anybody deserves death for racist cartoons, but it’s a very provocative response to broadcast the racist cartoons. It’s kind of a “fuck you” to all Muslims and is not helpful.
Were it Chuds doing this, it would be a "fuck you". When it's the government, it's more of a threat.
I get that, and france has been horrible to those people for a long time.
deleted by creator
You can't?
It's a pretty effective condemnation of their entire bullshit ideology.
deleted by creator
no.
deleted by creator
I don't think it's reasonable, I think it's understandable why they would target Charlie Hebdo for these cartoons.
The cartoon is just another way of making the point that "Islamic" extremists really don't in any way represent Islam and are just as dangerous to Muslims as anybody else, they would even kill the Prophet Muhammad.
Oh and I said ISIS because the source where I was reading more about the comic said that. That's all.
deleted by creator
Probably the same thing as if Jesus presented himself to a fundamentalist christian in America.