Fucking pieces of shit. Should not be this angry while drunk at nearly 4 in the night.

  • fx8690gii [he/him, he/him]
    hexbear
    24
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    But, youtube-dl doesn't have any DRM circumvention. How can they argue that this "circumvents the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services"?

    • wantonviolins [they/them]
      hexbear
      15
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      The idea is that because YouTube doesn’t have a download button, anything that lets you save content is a circumvention.

      It’s bad faith bullshit, intentional misrepresentation of how technology works, but that’s the RIAA’s whole deal.

      Edit: If this holds up, and it likely will because the ytdl developers don’t have the means to fight it, it will set an extremely dangerous precedent. Things like wget and curl could genuinely be at risk.

      • RussianEngineer [she/her]
        hexbear
        8
        4 years ago

        imagine trying to get basic linux commands banned. then again i put nothing above companies these days

      • eduardog3000 [he/him]
        hexbear
        3
        4 years ago

        Things like wget and curl could genuinely be at risk.

        Those would at least have legal backing from the FSF or something.

      • cadence [they/them,she/her]
        hexbear
        1
        4 years ago

        Not quite - on some videos, the stream URLs sent to the browser are encrypted with an algorithm that can be decrypted just fine in the browser, but takes a fair bit of reverse engineering to make it work in other places. Not defending the RIAA here lol but it's quite a bit more than "doesn't have a download button".

    • post_trains [he/him]
      hexbear
      14
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Right? I'm downloading it to my computer when I watch the video in a browser. That's how streaming works. There's no DRM unless you count "mild inconvenience" as a DRM measure.

    • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
      hexbear
      8
      4 years ago

      i would guess it's because they sell youtube a license for streaming, and downloading isn't covered by that or some shit

          • read_freire [they/them]
            hexbear
            1
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            sure and it's another example of the fundamental contradiction of DRM (all the more glaring when you're trying to use DRM to enforce IP over the wire), which is what I'm getting at

  • ChapoBapo [he/him]
    hexbear
    24
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Flashbacks to the DeCSS days and illegal primes.

    4 8565078965 7397829309 8418946942 8613770744 2087351357 9240196520 7366869851 3401047237 4469687974 3992611751 0973777701 0274475280 4905883138 4037549709 9879096539 5522701171 2157025974 6669932402 2683459661 9606034851 7424977358 4685188556 7457025712 5474999648 2194184655 7100841190 8625971694 7970799152 0048667099 7592359606 1320725973 7979936188 6063169144 7358830024 5336972781 8139147979 5551339994 9394882899 8469178361 0018259789 0103160196 1835034344 8956870538 4520853804 5842415654 8248893338 0474758711 2833959896 8522325446 0840897111 9771276941 2079586244 0547161321 0050064598 2017696177 1809478113 6220027234 4827224932 3259547234 6880029277 7649790614 8129840428 3457201463 4896854716 9082354737 8356619721 8622496943 1622716663 9390554302 4156473292 4855248991 2257394665 4862714048 2117138124 3882177176 0298412552 4464744505 5834628144 8833563190 2725319590 4392838737 6407391689 1257924055 0156208897 8716337599 9107887084 9081590975 4801928576 8451988596 3053238234 9055809203 2999603234 4711407760 1984716353 1161713078 5760848622 3637028357 0104961259 5681846785 9653331007 7017991614 6744725492 7283348691 6000647585 9174627812 1269007351 8309241530 1063028932 9566584366 2000800476 7789679843 8209079761 9859493646 3093805863 3672146969 5975027968 7712057249 9666698056 1453382074 1203159337 7030994915 2746918356 5937621022 2006812679 8273445760 9380203044 7912277498 0917955938 3871210005 8876668925 8448700470 7725524970 6044465212 7130404321 1826101035 9118647666 2963858495 0874484973 7347686142 0880529443

  • underisk [none/use name]
    hexbear
    22
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    RIAA must be getting desperate because they're not getting all that concert money right now. First they go after twitch, now this.

    Bet Github's new bosses at Microsoft have them take it down.

    Edit: nm I guess this is them already taking it down. In that case I’m betting it stays that way

  • l0l [he/him,they/them]
    hexbear
    14
    4 years ago

    This fucking sucks. Been using this to document certain streamed content for personal use. Luckily still have it installed.

    • garbology [he/him]
      hexbear
      10
      4 years ago

      It will always be widely available, this changes nothing.

      • l0l [he/him,they/them]
        hexbear
        7
        4 years ago

        It won't be as collaboratively maintained. It means that any new services won't be part of youtube-dl and instead we'll have to depend on the state of the repo as it was today when it got taken down. Also, any modifications to existing services will break youtube-dl as it is right now. Not ideal, just means that people who have coding skills will keep updating their own local copies, but the ones not in the know will have to give up.

        • garbology [he/him]
          hexbear
          15
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          OK, I stand corrected: this changes a little, because the next place the devs host yt-dl (gitea, self-hosted gitlab somewhere) will probably get a bit less contributions by drive-by github users, but you will definitely not need to maintain your own copy.

          • cadence [they/them,she/her]
            hexbear
            5
            4 years ago

            The communities are actively organising across gitter, IRC and matrix trying to put together a plan on how to proceed.

            The original developers were inactive so it doesn't matter that they don't personally get involved. This is currently in the hands of fairly competent developers. I don't think there's any reason to worry long term.

            Even if youtube-dl was wiped off the internet, there are also many other projects that accomplish the same goal that still exist, including Invidious, Second, NewPipeExtractor, LavaPlayer, ytdl-core, and many others that I've forgotten the names of.

  • emizeko [they/them]
    hexbear
    13
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I say this not to correct you but only to help you blend in as a native English speaker in case you need to infiltrate the US government

    we call it "4 in the morning"

  • gay [any]
    hexbear
    10
    4 years ago

    Le feeeze peach, the Great Chinese Firewall. Muh censorship. Lol. I hate the west <3. Go get rid of CP on social media, yk.

  • Janked [he/him]
    hexbear
    9
    4 years ago

    Imagine writing bullshit like that for a job.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    hexbear
    8
    4 years ago

    Alternative for anyone that wants one not currently being targeted by RIAA: https://github.com/Tyrrrz/YoutubeExplode

  • doublepepperoni [none/use name]
    hexbear
    8
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Fucking cunts :angery:

    So I hadn't updated to the last released version yet, and sadly updating it through the update command is out of the question currently. I did manage to grab a mirror of the repository as it was before it was taken down, but it's just a bunch of python files. Where can I get the last .exe?