• CoolerOpposide [none/use name]
    hexagon
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sure, it would make sense that you might think going from "The discussion is over." to "it is entirely possible" is progress of a sort. Of course, this is only if somewhere along the way you imagined me making the argument that this is what swung the election one way or the other, then in your own mind managed to successfully debate against the point I never made.

    And for the statistics in question, yes, 2020 voter turnout really does have nothing to do with 2024 voter turnout in the argument you are making unless you are making the assumption that the same exact slate of people showed up for both elections.

    Close to the same total number of people showing up ≠ the same exact group of people showed up +/- net difference

    • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
      ·
      4 days ago

      You cannot expect me to believe this schtick where you pretend this information doesn't belong in the context of the broader discussion about the outcome of the 2024 election. This is not a free floating factoid you happened to be interested in for the purely intellectual pursuit of understanding the motivations of Democratic voters. What is the importance of this information outside of that context?

      • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]
        hexagon
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you’d stop reading into things I didn’t say, this whole discussion would have been much less frustrating for you. It’s literally in the title of my post. The top reason Biden 2020 voters sat out of the 2024 election was Gaza. Literally that is the point. The point is that it was actually a reason people chose not to vote.

        • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
          ·
          3 days ago

          I'm not frustrated, even slightly.

          What discussion is over then? What is the purpose of bringing this up in all future elections, as the title directs me to do?