I have no idea what Amber's take is, but publications like The Economist and the Financial Times, generally put forward the perspective of a segment of the bourgeoisie in ways that are surprisingly honest.
Like I remember an issue of the Economist from a few years ago on the environmental crisis, and some of their takes were like the market mechanism is choking out the rollout of renewable energy technology and sending the whole industry into a "circle of death," and that the world is "losing the war against climate change. "
The part they don't get to, because it's a bourgeois perspective, is that socialism is the answer to capitalist crisis--be it political, environmental, or economic--so in that sense, no, Marxists and MBAs don't share the same knowledge and perspectives.
Isn’t this Amber’s take on “Financial Times?”
I have no idea what Amber's take is, but publications like The Economist and the Financial Times, generally put forward the perspective of a segment of the bourgeoisie in ways that are surprisingly honest.
Like I remember an issue of the Economist from a few years ago on the environmental crisis, and some of their takes were like the market mechanism is choking out the rollout of renewable energy technology and sending the whole industry into a "circle of death," and that the world is "losing the war against climate change. "
The part they don't get to, because it's a bourgeois perspective, is that socialism is the answer to capitalist crisis--be it political, environmental, or economic--so in that sense, no, Marxists and MBAs don't share the same knowledge and perspectives.