Social-Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism. There is no ground for assuming that the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie can achieve decisive successes in battles, or in governing the country, without the active support of Social-Democracy. There is just as little ground for thinking that Social-Democracy can achieve decisive successes in battles, or in governing the country, without the active support of the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie.
These organisations do not negate, but supplement each other. They are not antipodes, they are twins.
Fascism is an informal political bloc of these two chief organisations; a bloc, which arose in the circumstances of the post-war crisis of imperialism, and which is intended for combating the proletarian revolution. The bourgeoisie cannot retain power without such a bloc. It would therefore be a mistake to think that “pacifism” signifies the liquidation of fascism. In the present situation, “pacifism” is the strengthening of fascism with its moderate, Social-Democratic wing pushed into the forefront.
Social-fascism kids, its a thing
J V Stalin, Concerning the International Situation
The pacifism bit is so accurate. We already saw libs on Twitter trying to pre-counter any idea that violence would ever be necessary in the US.
dsa twitter doing the fucking same lol
Good ol' uncle Joe laying down the straight truth.
You love to see it folks
deleted by creator