It's still ignoring the fact that MLK was a socialist who would be totally behind the BLM protests with zero hand wringing, but it does push people in the right direction
I wouldn't really say it ignores that; of course MLK would support both the peaceful protests and the riots but he would lead the former, no? That was my intention in this context at least.
deleted by creator
It's still ignoring the fact that MLK was a socialist who would be totally behind the BLM protests with zero hand wringing, but it does push people in the right direction
I wouldn't really say it ignores that; of course MLK would support both the peaceful protests and the riots but he would lead the former, no? That was my intention in this context at least.