I honestly can not say I have a deep knowledge of the Syrian civil war except for a few things.
-
Multiple groups including Isis and the Syrian army are involved, some of which are US backed
-
Rojava and the Kurds seem genuinely unproblematic and cool, and are currently being attacked by Syria and Turkey, and their support was withdrawn by trump.
-
The resulting refugee crisis is a big deal, etc etc. I’ve actually been fortunate enough to talk with several refugees as my mother works in local government helping sponsor them, and one family threw a party and invited us. The food was delicious, but I felt like asking a family who had just been reunited with a family member after years about the civil war would not be a good idea. So I can’t say I learned much from the conversations I’ve had.
I see lots of Assad memes. Is it ironic? Is it unironic? Is it a big critical support deal like Kim Jong un? What’s the consensus? Can someone educate me or?
Thanks.
Meh maybe you shouldn’t unironically critically support him, he’s not a leftist. It’s more like one should oppose US/nato intervention and advocate for better refugee treatment. It’s much more consistent position and easier to argue with libs, compared to “Assad done nothing wrong” thought termination.
Assad has a higher approval rating than the majority of US presidents
Assad has done nothing wrong except defend his country against one of the worst crimes the West has committed this century
😬
For someone who's "done nothing wrong" Assad sure tends to hang out with a lot of fucking fascists.
Also, homosexuality is still illegal in Ba'athist Syria and has been since 1949 with a penalty of 3 years in prison for sex acts.
Pretty sure "Human Dignity Trust" is a CIA front just by the name but they quote actual Syrian penal code which I couldn't find elsewhere in a hurry: https://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/syria/
Edit: human dignity trust seems more likely to be MI6 than CIA but you get the picture
Did Assad write that law or did the Mps of parliament write them? :thinkin-lenin:
if you asked the average Syrian do you think they would have progressive values comparable to the West or reactionary ones given their economic wealth in comparison? :thinkin-lenin:
What part of giving literal Neo-Nazis medals and TV time says "has done nothing wrong" to you?
Given Syria and Libyas history (Libya financing IRA)its probably Assads way of fucking with the West and fermenting internal conflict to highlight reprobabtes like that in which case critical support for trying to fuck with the West
Critical support for ... David Duke? in his struggle against ... anti-fascism?
The only threat to the US state are the right wing nationalists
If you were the leader of a country like Syria i could see a very good foreign policy argument in promoting the greatest threat to the US state
That's not why the Ba'athists are doing it.
They took in Nazi officials fleeing Germany and have been supporting international fascism ever since.
Approval rating in war-torn country is patently meaningless, of course after eight years of this bloodbath people would want to chill and return to some kind of normalcy.
And Ba’ath party was arresting communists in the 90s I thought? Also Kurds didn’t spontaneously rebel, they had some issues with him. And communist party supported (more or less) more autonomy for them, I believe.
Frankly, it’s meaningless argument I feel. As I’ve mentioned it’s better if Assad stays and gives concessions to saner rebel groups, then US overthrows him, put some mercenary ghouls around oil fields and funnel weapons around the state to keep divided people fighting over nothing, doesn’t make him a good guy. Politicians by default should be treated with extreme suspicion.
And now those communists are behind Assad
Its almost like when circumstances change so should your strategy:thinkin-lenin:
Well no shit, doesn’t make him a good guy (tm). Like do you think Chang Kaishek and kmt were good guys? Or they were the least bad option for early cpc to support?