did you read the article or not? it says it's because he'll be tougher on climate change, human rights and corruption. which id be ok with if i trusted them to do those things. or not use those reasons to invade or some shit.
The flamethrowers came in and we burnt the hamlet. Burnt up everything. They had a lot of rice. We opened the bags, just throw it all over the street. Look for tunnels. Killing animals. Killing all the livestock. Guys would carry chemicals that they would put in the well. Poison the water so they couldn’t use it… They killed some more people here. Maybe 12 or 14 or more. Old people and little kids that wouldn’t leave. I guess their grandparents. People that were old in Vietnam couldn’t leave their village.
That's straight up just a list of Casus Belli libs find acceptable.
The problem isn't the listed reasons, it's the "tougher". There isn't a non-harmful way for the US state to be "tougher" on Latin America regardless of stated reasons.
did you read the article or not? it says it's because he'll be tougher on climate change, human rights and corruption. which id be ok with if i trusted them to do those things. or not use those reasons to invade or some shit.
https://soundcloud.com/citationsneeded/episode-08-the-human-rights-concern-troll-industrial-complex
that's all it is used for though
deleted by creator
That's straight up just a list of Casus Belli libs find acceptable.
The problem isn't the listed reasons, it's the "tougher". There isn't a non-harmful way for the US state to be "tougher" on Latin America regardless of stated reasons.