Apparently the strategy is to have the supreme court declare the results invalid due to "fraud" and then electoral college cant be called and states will vote, which will give Trump the win. Not sure of logistics if it's possible, but seems they are trying
the strategy is to have the supreme court declare the results invalid due to “fraud” and then electoral college cant be called and states will vote
how "invalid" do the results have to be for this to happen? fraud in 1 single state? all 50 states? just enough states with enough EC votes that they can argue that the election was swung from those states alone?
and what exactly are their plans to prove fraud, every time I look into one of the accusations going around in conservative networks, there's either no proof of the proof is easily disproved
the more I think about it, the less sense it makes. supposing he successfully proves to a court that he won a particular state, wouldn't that state's electoral college votes just go to him? and he could win by just doing so for enough states. how does the part about "states will vote" come in?
I think the idea is not to actually win those states, but get the supreme court to invalidate the vote completely, and then apparently it could go to some strange state elector system. I don't understand it either, system is so convoluted, but if there's a loophole to won they will gladly use it, especially having the handpicked supreme court
Apparently the strategy is to have the supreme court declare the results invalid due to "fraud" and then electoral college cant be called and states will vote, which will give Trump the win. Not sure of logistics if it's possible, but seems they are trying
how "invalid" do the results have to be for this to happen? fraud in 1 single state? all 50 states? just enough states with enough EC votes that they can argue that the election was swung from those states alone?
and what exactly are their plans to prove fraud, every time I look into one of the accusations going around in conservative networks, there's either no proof of the proof is easily disproved
the more I think about it, the less sense it makes. supposing he successfully proves to a court that he won a particular state, wouldn't that state's electoral college votes just go to him? and he could win by just doing so for enough states. how does the part about "states will vote" come in?
I think the idea is not to actually win those states, but get the supreme court to invalidate the vote completely, and then apparently it could go to some strange state elector system. I don't understand it either, system is so convoluted, but if there's a loophole to won they will gladly use it, especially having the handpicked supreme court