Many COVID-19 survivors are likely to be at greater risk of developing mental illness, psychiatrists said on Monday, after a large study found 20% of those infected with the coronavirus are diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder within 90 days.
You realize other countries beside the United States exist, and that they are doing a much better job containing the pandemic? You honestly sound like a troll.
By assuming that random conspiratorial new agey articles are correct in saying a coronavirus is a cia bioweapon? That isn't skepticism it's uncritical consumption of anything that postures itself as critical or counter
Because it's potentially biased. That doesn't mean that everything that comes from Chinese media is 100% true and factual as a consequence, nor does it mean everything western media says about China is incorrect. Just because an official narrative may be suspect, does not automatically make any other narrative counter to it valid. You have to discern more carefully what you accept as true or plausible, and get out of this binary thought pattern where anything that postures itself as counter to the bad official story automatically is given more weight. Because if you are not careful you will find yourself becoming disconnected from reality. Don't automatically trust or believe any source outright.
I have been paying attention. Have you noticed how Biden is always saying “Dark Winter?”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dark_Winter
He has plans
https://theconsciousresistance.com/the-darkest-winter-2020/
You realize other countries beside the United States exist, and that they are doing a much better job containing the pandemic? You honestly sound like a troll.
I’m just shooting from the hip. My source is Twitter, so I could be pretty wrong about this
You're almost certainly wrong
It’s always healthy to be skeptical of the state narrative
By assuming that random conspiratorial new agey articles are correct in saying a coronavirus is a cia bioweapon? That isn't skepticism it's uncritical consumption of anything that postures itself as critical or counter
There’s a reason why we don’t trust anything western media says about China.
Because it's potentially biased. That doesn't mean that everything that comes from Chinese media is 100% true and factual as a consequence, nor does it mean everything western media says about China is incorrect. Just because an official narrative may be suspect, does not automatically make any other narrative counter to it valid. You have to discern more carefully what you accept as true or plausible, and get out of this binary thought pattern where anything that postures itself as counter to the bad official story automatically is given more weight. Because if you are not careful you will find yourself becoming disconnected from reality. Don't automatically trust or believe any source outright.