The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, the alternatives are heavy metal, which also aren't the greatest to breathe in. It's almost like war is aweful and this one shouldn't have been started in the first place, but here we are...

      • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        ·
        1 year ago

        And what, let the Russians steamroll Ukraine and take everything? Let them destroy a fledgling democracy? Right on the EU's and NATO's doorstep? Come on.

        • Kuori [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          fledgling democracy

          lmao are you fucking kidding

          and shit while we're at it, what the fuck do you think NATO has been doing its entire existence? it's been destroying -actual- fledgling democracies, you monstrously hypocritical ass

        • fuckiforgotmypasswor [comrade/them,any]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          let the Russians steamroll Ukraine and take everything?

          I've noticed that every pro-NATO voice screaming "war good" has to pretend like the binary outcome of this war is a) Ukraine becomes Russia and every living inhabitant is genocided (see above comment from bibibi for case in point), or b) Ukraine heroically drives back Russia with magic in a completely asymmetrical and unwinnable war

          Come on.

          And then finishes their comment with something like this

          There's no material analysis to support any of this

          The only way to get to that viewpoint is to believe Putin is an irrational, genocidal maniac hellbent on killing checks notes neighbors who are ethnically russian, who also desperately wants to push even more of Russia's border right up against a hostile NATO. It's no surprise that the people saying this shit are pro NATO and don't understand the material reality underlying geopolitical conflicts like this one

          Not gonna touch the "fledgeling democracy" thing, other comrades can dunk on that chefs-kiss

          • CombatLiberalism [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            This entire thread is proof that the liberal understanding of geopolitics and foreign policy is entirely vibes based

          • bibibi@lemmy.ml
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            1. "ethnical russian" - what is that?

            2. russian imperialism is a thing. People there are brainwashed with russia's greatness ideas and expansion. putin's actions just represent the will of russians.

            3. The fact we were attacked and lost that many people is already a defeat. We lost this war when gave up nukes under the push of the west and russia. this together with naivness of our post-soviet people defined the path of our degradation. But it neither a win for russia, and won't be. Russia was always corrupted just like Ukraine, it just got more resources and nukes, but that's it. without the above fact and support of the west, maybe we would not be able to suppress them

            • fuckmyphonefuckingsu [comrade/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              putin's actions just represent the will of russians.

              this is your brain on liberalism

              but thank you for at least conceding america deserved 9/11

            • fuckiforgotmypasswor [comrade/them,any]
              ·
              1 year ago

              russian imperialism is a thing

              i just can't anymore, the cognitive dissonance is fucking astounding, yall can deal with the libs in this thread

              im just gonna let people like this LIB continue to suck off the western imperialists sending radiated shells to his neighborhood, slava ukrani buddy

            • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh man I still remember the post that was leaked from russian government webpage on the 25th, a day after russian invaded. It was an absolute hard on about russian imperialism and how they will restore the good old russian empire or something, which included most slavic countries btw. It was taken down in hours but I checked that the addess was correct and legit. No proof of it since it's been a year already and I saved nothing, so if you don't believe it ignore me and please don't spread this since I have no source anymore, but damn if it doesn't paint a clear picture of russia's intent on all of this since way before.

              • Zrc
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                deleted by creator

              • smiley
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        ·
        1 year ago

        The real alternative is for Russians to go home. Who the fuck cares who's using them? They're being invaded. Russia didn't need to invade them, but they thought they could get away with it (again). This isnt the first invasion of a sovereign country Russia has done. It isn't even the first invasion of Ukraine. The US didn't get involved in the others. Are we just going to excuse those?

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don't know why people keep repeating this. Do you honestly think this is a coherent point? Russia is obviously not going to go home no matter how many times you're going to repeat it. It's a meaningless and useless statement that literally solves nothing. Either NATO can defeat Russia or not, so far it looks like NATO is not able to do so. What NATO is accomplishing is prolonging the conflict without changing the outcome. That means more people dying and having their lives ruined so that US military industry can make a profit and so that US can try and weaken Russia geopolitically. Anybody who thinks the west is in this conflict to help Ukraine is an utter imbecile.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            ·
            1 year ago

            Should the US have sent supplies to the allies in WWI and WWII before joining? It was just prolonging the war and causing people to die, right?

            The reason the US is doing it is not morality. Everyone knows that. International politics is never about morality, it's about power. However, that doesn't mean it isn't also the moral option.

            Also, NATO and the US are not in the war. We're sending supplies. The US isn't even sending the good stuff. We're sending parts of our stockpile that's old and has just been sitting around waiting for a use. They haven't sent the newer technology so it it isn't studied in case a real enemy requires them to be used.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
              ·
              1 year ago

              It takes an incredible amount of historical illiteracy to try and draw parallels between WW2 and the proxy war US is waging against Russia in Ukraine. However, if you weren't historically illiterate, then you'd also know that US companies continued working with the nazis well into the war, and IBM is famously responsible for facilitating the holocaust.

              Also, NATO and the US are very obviously in this war, and one has to be utterly intellectually dishonest to pretend otherwise.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                ·
                1 year ago

                When the US government was providing resources to the allies, was it good or bad? I'm not talking companies or anything else. You're dodging the question. There are enough parallels to draw a comparison. You just know what the answer would be and it conflicts with your beliefs, so you can't admit it, to yourself or others.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  When US government provides resources to these people, is it good or bad?

                  • https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/neo-nazis-far-right-ukraine/
                  • https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/neo-nazis-far-right-ukraine/
                  • https://jacobinmag.com/2022/02/maidan-protests-neo-nazis-russia-nato-crimea
                  • https://www.internationalmagz.com/articles/conversation-with-dmitri-kovalevich
                  • https://www.mintpressnews.com/volodymyr-zelensky-secret-police-hunted-down-opposition-anatoly-shariy/280200/

                  And this is why your comparison is historically illiterate. The actual comparison would be US funding the nazis in WW2. You're either ignorant of whom US is propping up in Ukraine or you're just dishonest. Either way not a good look.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                ·
                1 year ago

                More What-aboutism to dodge answering the question. That's expected, and it's about as good as an answer to me and anyone paying attention.

                • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You brought up the example of the US in relation to WWII. If you make a comparison, you can't get stroppy when people point out that it contradicts your main argument and in fact supports the argument that you're trying to challenge.

                  However, for as long as you think the US is the Good GuyTM, you're going to struggle to find examples that support your viewpoint, so you may want to be careful with any comparison. Otherwise, you'll start to notice a pattern of them pointing out that the US was as monstrous as always in the cited example and then you'll say they're doing whataboutism ad infinitum.

                  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It doesn't contradict my example. Companies are not the government.

                    I don't think the US are "the good guys." There aren't good guys in international politics. They don't do things for moral reasons. I do think the invaders are bad, whichever war were talking about. The US happens to be giving supplies to the people fighting off an invasion now and in WWI and WWII.

                    You still didn't answer the god damn question. Again, expected. You guys never answer the fucking question. You just go on offense because then you get to act smart and in control, but it makes you look weak and stupid. If you can't answer a simple question then what good is your opinion?

        • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you ever played 4x games? Do you know what encirclement is? When an opponent is ringing your territory with bases while they keep telling you it's totally cool bro, they're just working on their defenses while making alliances with players adjacent to you, what do you consider is their end game?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, everyone Russia has invaded has been for defence. Sure buddy. The real world is more complex than a 4X game, but even then you can use that to understand why someone would invade another country. They wanted to steal the resources and population. You may use your statement as a justification, but it is never the actual reason. The excuse of it being defensive is rediculous. Yeah, invading a sovereign country (multiple times) is sure to make the alliance "encircling" you stop. Seriously? Do you believe that rhetoric or are you just saying it because you're supposed to?

      • bibibi@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. if Ukraine lose completely most of ukrainans living in Ukraine simply get extriminated or forcely assimilated.
        2. Russia started the war when invided Ukraine in 2014. not sure where the "using" is.
          • bibibi@lemmy.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            tell me what's right. I'm ukrainian living in Ukraine. but please, your bs about дамбілі бамбас won't work

            btw Im not happy with NATO neither with western history. I just know personally what russian imperialistic shit looks like

                • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  their relatives were Jews killed in WW2 by the Nazis and Ukrainian collaborateurs like Bandera. That's abundantly clear from context

                  • bibibi@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    not clear at all. no mention about ww2 in his comment. moreover we did not talk about ww2 before, so this is most likely a watabolistic attempt justifying killing ukrainians because some of our ancestors were participating in pogroms of jews.

                    if we were talking about xx and previous centuries, then I would also mention crimes done by russians, poles and germans toward ukrainians

                    Regarding antisemitism, I would also mention that pogroms in the russian empire especially in places jews were allowed to live in (see the Pale of Settlement) and in europe were common.

                    Collaborants were everywhere in europe, america and russia. Regarding latter, see nazi-soviet parade in Brest-Litovsk as an example. But for some reason you only mentrion ukrainians and Bandera.